Page 842 - tmp

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 09 April 2014 23:44
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for trial at Woolwich Crown Court warned list
Hi Josey

I have noted things also can you also ask how Mr patel paid these invoices? Not sure if that can be done and
when I last spoke with Mr Allway he had been trying to get a face to face meeting with Mr Patel each time he
called to try and sort it someone picked the phone up and said Mr Patel was on holiday. He also did not believe
this and also and also said that the invoiced that had been sent in was not real ones he new they were fishy.

nd
Also due to the x3 claims Nikki went to the warehouse on the 28/03/2013 after the 2 break­in on the
25/03/2013 and from the file Mr Patel did not even tell her that he had fixed the wall and paid for it on the
21/03/2014 and he must have known already that on the 29/03/2013 the same company was coming to fix the
wall again. Nikki was there on the 28/03/2013 taking pictures. So why did he not tell her this then? Also he said
he had to leave the warehouse as the insurance company wanted to take pictures. Yet Nikki I am sure only went
nd
to the warehouse once and that was after the 2 break­in on the 25/03/2013.

Also looking at the invoices they don’t even have an invoice number. There no costing for anything on them. I
would like the invoices checked and I mean really checked the right person could tell when these invoices was
printed.

Its also very funny that the same said part of the wall was damaged 3 times if they had fixed it correctly it would
have been much harder as it was new why was the same said part of the wall now done 3 times. And yet also in
the file for the March claim Mr Patel only told the insurance company about the alarm there was no wall said
about in the March claim. I have not had time yet to look at all the statements but I will most likely have more to
say and so will Simon.

Also £600.00 to fix the said wall and yet he is saying to the police £8000 to £10,000 for the damage to the
building?

And Mr Patel did not do stock take from Feb 2013 case none was also done in March 2013 nor May 2013 yet for
the May 2013 case he can come up with a cost of around £8220?

I will read over the rest of this later I only just really looked at it a very little did not even read Mr Patel statement
fully and I have seen this.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 April 2014 18:19
To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth
Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for trial at Woolwich Crown Court warned list

Dear Simon / Lorraine

I refer to the above matter.

I can confirm that Counsel has written on his court note that Simon is now subject to a condition of
residence only. I will still request the bail sheet and forward it to you from the Crown Court to avoid
any confusion.

I attach a copy of a Notice of Additional Evidence dated 8th April 2014. You will no doubt note the
discrepancies in the statement of DC Mayhew dated 3rd April 2014.

For clarification if there is no statement from the noise abatement officer by 10th April 2014 I will be
listing the case for mention. The statement of DC Mayhew referring to the Inspector who attended on
820