Page 844 - tmp
P. 844

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
            Sent: 10 April 2014 19:03
            To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
            Subject: RE: Bail Conditions

            Attachments: New­Bail­08­04­2014.pdf
            Hi Josey

            As to what was said about the bail condition below

            “I can confirm that Counsel has written on his court note that Simon is now subject to a condition of
            residence only.  I will still request the bail sheet and forward it to you from the Crown Court to avoid
            any confusion.”

            I went to the police station and got a copy as to what was sent over to them please see attached.

            Also I spoke to Woolwich myself on phone and they said 3 things were listed. They also said really
            the judge should have read all bail conditions out, and not just said your bail conditions are now to
            reside at address known to court.

            So can this be addressed and ask them to hear the recorded tape of what was in fact said or even ask
            the judge
            .
            Lorraine






            From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
            Sent: 09 April 2014 18:19
            To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth
            Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for trial at Woolwich Crown Court warned list

            Dear Simon / Lorraine

            I refer to the above matter.


            I can confirm that Counsel has written on his court note that Simon is now subject to a condition of
            residence only.  I will still request the bail sheet and forward it to you from the Crown Court to avoid
            any confusion.

            I attach a copy of a Notice of Additional Evidence dated 8th April 2014.  You will no doubt note the
            discrepancies in the statement of DC Mayhew dated 3rd April 2014.

            For clarification if there is no statement from the noise abatement officer by 10th April 2014 I will be
            listing the case for mention.  The statement of DC Mayhew referring to the Inspector who attended on
            the date of the scene the day of the illegal rave is inaccurate.  Inspector Mc Millen's statement refers to
            attending the scene of a reported burglary and he notes that there were no squatters signs up.  I will
            therefore need Simon to deal with this in his proof exhibiting extracts of his Facebook page which
            shows the notices etc.  I will be asking for the statements of the officers who attended with the noise
            abatement officers and all updates on the CAD system.  I am asking for a copy of the CD of
            photographs from the SOCO from February 2013 referred to in the statement of Paul Whittaker.


                                                     822
   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849