Page 645 - tmp
P. 645

Firstly, apologies for my delayed reply! I had intended to
                                   reply much sooner.
                                   I think I’m correct in saying that the necessity for your
                                   son’s arrest was associated with PC G’s uncertainty as to
                                   the address provided. This is something I’ll discuss in the
                                   report.
                                   Can I ask, from where did you get the impression that
                                   your son’s name was not in PC G’s pocketbook?
                                   To reiterate, I’d be more than happy share documents
                                   with you at the end of the investigation. As per the
                                   Police Reform Act, subject to the harm test. Was there
                                   any particular reason you’d want them sooner? I expect
                                   the investigation to conclude in October incidentally.
                                   I was intending on giving PC G three weeks, what are
                                   your thoughts on that?
                                   Re PC G’s current occupation, I can assure you it would
                                   have no bearing on this matter whatsoever.
                                   Kind regards
                                   Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
                                   (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards |
                                   MetPhone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675  | Email
                                   Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
                                   Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
                                   London, SW6 1TR
                                   'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear
                                   or favour’
                                   From: Lorraine Cordell
                                   [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
                                   Sent: 31 July 2017 17:43
                                   To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional
                                   Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>
                                   Subject: RE: Our meeting today.
                                   Dear Jamie Newman
                                   Thank you for the update email and I also hope you are
                                   well, can I ask a few things please now that you have
                                   had time to go over the documents and information.
                                   Regarding PC G notebook is my son's name at the top
                                   and has it been checked if a radio check was done on my
                                   son on that day, I find it hard to believe that my son's
                                   name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to
                                   give his name and that is why he was arrested, how
                                   would he have had my son's details to talk to the
                                   insurance companies which there is no dispute that he did
                                   and he would have needed my son's details to be able to
                                   give them to the insurance companies, which would mean
                                   he unlawfully arrested my son.
                                   I know you said you would have no problem giving us the
                                   notebook and his statement and other information, does
                                   this mean we can not get this information until after the
                                   investigation is completed?
                                   What will happen if PC G does not want to assist in this
                                   investigation, how long will you give him to reply to your
                                   letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the
                                   investigation?
                                   I know this time we will have the right to appeal to the
                                   IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do believe there is
                                   enough information and I can not see why the CPS would
                                   not want to take this further, the only reason I can see
                                                                3623
   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650