Page 645 - tmp
P. 645
Firstly, apologies for my delayed reply! I had intended to
reply much sooner.
I think I’m correct in saying that the necessity for your
son’s arrest was associated with PC G’s uncertainty as to
the address provided. This is something I’ll discuss in the
report.
Can I ask, from where did you get the impression that
your son’s name was not in PC G’s pocketbook?
To reiterate, I’d be more than happy share documents
with you at the end of the investigation. As per the
Police Reform Act, subject to the harm test. Was there
any particular reason you’d want them sooner? I expect
the investigation to conclude in October incidentally.
I was intending on giving PC G three weeks, what are
your thoughts on that?
Re PC G’s current occupation, I can assure you it would
have no bearing on this matter whatsoever.
Kind regards
Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards |
MetPhone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675 | Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR
'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear
or favour’
From: Lorraine Cordell
[mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 31 July 2017 17:43
To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional
Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: RE: Our meeting today.
Dear Jamie Newman
Thank you for the update email and I also hope you are
well, can I ask a few things please now that you have
had time to go over the documents and information.
Regarding PC G notebook is my son's name at the top
and has it been checked if a radio check was done on my
son on that day, I find it hard to believe that my son's
name is not in PC G notebook as and my son refused to
give his name and that is why he was arrested, how
would he have had my son's details to talk to the
insurance companies which there is no dispute that he did
and he would have needed my son's details to be able to
give them to the insurance companies, which would mean
he unlawfully arrested my son.
I know you said you would have no problem giving us the
notebook and his statement and other information, does
this mean we can not get this information until after the
investigation is completed?
What will happen if PC G does not want to assist in this
investigation, how long will you give him to reply to your
letter before you decide he is not willing to assist in the
investigation?
I know this time we will have the right to appeal to the
IPCC, if we are not happy, but I do believe there is
enough information and I can not see why the CPS would
not want to take this further, the only reason I can see
3623