Page 649 - tmp

[mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
Sent: 31 July 2017 14:14
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Our meeting today.

Good Afternoon Lorraine,

I hope this email finds you well.

Further to our meeting last month I have written to PC
G to give him the opportunity to participate in the re‐
investigation, I await his reply. When and if he replies I
shall of course let you know.

Regarding a CPS referral, having reviewed the evidence I
am currently of the view that such a referral should be
left to the determination of our Appropriate Authority (
A.A. ‐ senior officer who reviews my report) upon the
conclusion of the investigation. As it stands, I see
nothing to prohibit such a referral, should the A.A. think
it appropriate.

As you know, should the A.A. elect not to refer the
matter to the CPS, you would of course have a right of
appeal to the IPCC along those lines.

If you have any questions for me please do let me know.

Kind regards

Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards |

MetPhone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675 | Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR
'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear
or favour’

From: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of
Professional Standards
Sent: 30 June 2017 17:23
To: 'Lorraine Cordell' <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject: Our meeting today.

Good Afternoon Lorraine,

Thank you for taking the team to meet with this
afternoon, I found our meeting very useful in enabling
me to better understand your complaint.

To confirm, the first thing I shall consider is a referral to
the CPS. I shall begin by examining what consideration
was given to such a referral by the previous investigator,

3627