Page 509 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 509
After the call you made today and talked to myself Miss Lorraine Cordell, I am sending over the
information you asked for. I do feel also that KMG asking to speak to the police office is in breach of
my data protection, but I will be willing to write and allow them to do this. As I said to KMG
yesterday on a phone that was made to them when I talked to Kelly Tilley I have not been found
guilty at a court of law for not having no insurance and it is for a court of law to find me guilty not a
police officer who thinks I done something when I have not.
Even if KGM does speak to the police office he will still say what he feels and that is not a fact that I
am guilty of anything. To be found guilty it would have to be done in front of a judge. Also Martin as
you said on the phone today when you in fact talked to the police on that day not once did they say I
had anything in my van that would void my insurance, and in fact I believe at this stage if the police
did in fact have proof they would have said to you that my van was full of things which is not the
case. I would like to also know if my insurance is going to carry on while this matter is addressed or if
it will be closed down on the
27/11/2013
as the letter says that KGM have sent me. And if KMG is going to close down my policy I would like
full written conditions of what part of my policy I have broken. As for the letter of complain that will
be going to the police Simon still has not fully read over it to make sure there is no errors or anything
else that needs adding but it does go into details as to what went on, it is only for use by yourself and
KGM to read only. Also as I said on the phone to you today the police are also telling me that the 3
times that my vehicles were seized and I had to pay for them to be taken out of the compound, I will
need to claim this back from my insurance company as they had not done their job and put them on
the database so they are at fault not the police. You said to me today that KGM are looking into this as
they are on the database and it should show up to the police that I am in fact insured. This has not
been the case for me and I have suffered badly due to this and this is the reason I have to carry my
insurance policy at all times so when I get pulled over by the police I can show them my documents,
as the police say it does not show up as I am insured, this is also the reason the insurance company
have had so many calls from the police to asked if I am insured or not since my policy started. Could
you please send me proof that the vehicles where on the database so I can put the claim in to the
police to get my money back for the times my vehicles were seized. As at this stage I do not want to
have to put a freedom of information act into yourselves or the police to the amount of times that the
police have in fact had to call my insurance company to see if I was insured due to the police saying I
was not insured. I have always been very happy with Broadsure Direct that is why I have still use
them and would like my insurance to carry on under them.
From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57
To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com'
Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell
Hi Martin
Can you let me know by email if I am going to still have insurance as from the?
27/11/2013
please, I got a letter saying my insurance will be closed from the
27/11/2013
and I cannot see the reason for this as I have done nothing wrong.
Many Thanks
Simon Cordell
From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 15 November 2013 13:57
To: 'martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com'
Subject: FW: RE: Simon Cordell
Dear martin
296,
After a next call and talking to oily he asked me to send over the receipt of me buying the van please
see
attached scan. I am waiting for the new logbook to come from DVLA.
Simon