Page 659 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 659

closed the policy due to this. Why is it the case you say you lost £400+ on this policy when I
               had paid I think around £300 deposit this would mean 1 months insurance cost over £700+
               when it was Policy plan issue they knew the 2 claims was in force so why is it we was never
               told as we would never of allowed the amount to be paid to them knowing it was down to
               them they are the ones that stopped the policy not my son. 1 month later after this policy
               started Policy plan stopped it due to the 2 claims that where on record with KGM. But I know
               they knew about the claims when the policy started as Martin had told them this before they
               started the policy, I believe Martin also told them 1 claim was due to be removed, KGM did
               take their time removing this claim In the end I had to deal with it and it was removed I sent
               over the details to Martin and it was confirmed it was removed this should have not been kept
               on Simon record as he did not own the Vehicle and proved this. Could it also be confirmed
               this is not on record for Simon. The 2nd claim was classed as no fault later I believe could
               this be confirmed please. 2nd policy started 19/05/2015 Co Vea insurance could you please
               tell me date these police stopped and what reason and also how much had been paid. 3rd
               policy started Policy plan not sure of start date of this. There should have only been 3 policies
               since April 2014. But I would like all information on each of them. And all payments made. I
               have also been sending emails to Martin but have had no replies I have also asked him to
               send Simon No claims discount, but nothing has been sent. I have some real issues as said
               many times due to the KGM policy Simon had forked out a lot of money that he should never
               have had to. There are around 9 Vehicle seizers at a cost to Simon of around £1800. There are
               all the dates he had to go to court for no insurance due to the errors on the MID database from
               2013/2014 while the KGM policy was in place. And due to 4 of them cases where no
               summons was sent, he was found guilty and points added he had his licence revoked 3 times
               and has not been able to drive. there is the date of the 14/11/2013 where the police lied to
               KGM to void his insurance which nearly happened and due to KGM failing to deal with 3
               subject access requests Simon was found guilty and banned from driving £1000 he had to
               paid the court and 6 points on his licence due to the police officer lied to the Judge under oath
               about the so called tools being in the so he was found guilty again. this went to appeal and
               was heard on the 05/03/2015 but this time due to me dealing with KGM in a way I should not
               have had to, I did in fact get the
               1871,
               information that was needed to prove in fact the police officer lied, the Judge was appalled
               and that is using mid words as to what was said in court because once again the police officer
               lied under oath to the judge in fact the police officer was told not to leave the court building.
               Simon won this case and there is a huge complaint with the police at this time. Simon for the
               appeal had to pay for a barrister at the cost of £2475.00 Martin was also asked to do a witness
               statement for this case but failed to do so. He still has 2 more appeals for no insurance one
               listed for May 2015 most of his 2014/2015 insurance he has not been able to drive due to
               KGM and what they made happen to his driving licence. But I know cancelling an insurance
               policy after it has started would incur large costs, so we have just been paying for something
               he has really not been able to use. So yes, a claim for costs will be going into KGM which
               will be a large about of money. For what has happened to my son as he not been able to work
               also due to his job which he does need to drive to do this and has not been able to do so. I
               also believe I am now going to have to put a subject access request under the data protection
               act 1994 into Broadsure Direct to get all the data as Martin has stopped replying to my
               emails. If you can confirm the above, I would be grateful as I will need these for my record.
               Regards
               Lorraine Cordell
               From: Melanie Tyman
               Mail To: melanietwyman@broadsuredirect.com
   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664