Page 1651 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

To: josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com
Dear Josie
I do not understand why it is not in my best interests for you to serve the suggested
amendments that I made in relation towards the letter that you proposed sending to Ms Sally
Gilchrist.
The reason I do not understand is because:
1. Mr Morris advice on 4th April 2016 was the same as what I had explained to yourself
when the case had started dated 12th September 2014 as received on receipt by yourself
and by method of email's and them email's referred to the respondent's application of an
Asbo order quoting "That a case should not rely solely on hearsay" as mine seems to do
by the police officer's. Most of the hearsay in any case is reported to be third party and
therefore carry less weight in any case.
2. I want to show the true facts about the case as I am the one who is suffering because of
untrue cut and paste facts that represent the basics of the respondent's case and that singed
evidence being off fabricated police statements, as detailed in the amendments towards
your letter to Sally Gilchrist, whom is already in receipt of such evidence but refuses to
act upon such intelligence in accordance of the law and you advise me to ignore this even
low I suffer.
3. I understand that a lot of the matters that should be dealt with at court will be.
4. I still argue for a speedy and fair trial: and feel that when a judge asks the respondent to
reply by a set date such as the 1/08/2016 as the judge HHJ PAWLAK has ordered to
happen it should.
5. The respondent should do so within the time duration as dated 01/09/2016 and agreed
with the judge and then received with the correct response, as has not happened.
6. I have been awaiting the reply since 00/02/2016 from an ongoing civil application that is
dated 13th August 2014 so to be able to have a fair trial.
7. After waiting on the 01/-9-2016 with no response I waited till the 2/09/2016 and
telephoned the respondent I spoke with a lady called sally gill Hurst, she states that she
has served some paperwork to my solicitor's at the beginning of august a month prior,
after finishing our conversation I contacted my solicitor she explained to me that she was
away on holiday and that I must wait till she gets back on the 6th September 2016.
8. I again put the phone down and called my solicitor firm's office to see if any paperwork
had been served to be told no.
9. On the 8TH August I spoke with my mother who explained to me that she had been in
contact with my solicitor and that I would be reviving a letter to sign to be sent to Sally
Gill Hurst.
10. On receiving this letter, it raised the following concerns.
11. The paperwork has not been served in time.
12. In a preliminary hearing, so to be ready for the appeal the judge ordered this to be
achieved.
13. The respondent has had another 6 months sine 22/02/2016 from the start of the on goings
as dated 13/08/2014
14. We are now at 08/09/2016 the appeal is on the 26/09/2016 this leads me to the concerns
of once again the case being postponed, as it has already been ten times before.
15. I have handed to article Six the right to a speedy and fair trial in regard to some of my
human rights being breached because of the on goings in the ASBO proceedings drafting
clear corruption and fabricated evidence asking for the case to be investigated our the
correct paperwork to be served in accordance to my response to HHJ PAWLAK.
16. Yes, my instructions are clear, I did not organised any illegal raves or provide any
equipment with an intention of holding an illegal rave and surely did not cause any Anti-