Page 1652 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Social behaviour on the dates sighted, this is also to include Mill Marsh Lane with no
exception.
17. Yes, in some I am visiting my friends who are or were homeless at the time.
18. The legal technicality you state that I refer to i.e. absence of trespass that does not prevent
parties from being held in accordance of the law, may lead to a standalone anti-social
behaviour order if a person commits a public order offence, to which I did not cause as I
was not organizer neither did I take part in the organisation of the party or did I commit
any civil or criminal offence. –
748,
-- In any one un-regular occasion over the duration of the weekend I can a understand the
noise nuisance and distress to neighbours this can cause if the allegations were to be true
and not fabricated by police as I can prove. I was not the organizer of the event.
19. The case is based on what the respondent based it upon and in my case, this is the
organisation of illegal raves not the organisation of raves: -
20. I proved that indoor parties are not illegal unless there is a breach of the licensing act
2003 as this is the law for entertainment.
21. That the word rave cannot be used in a building as section 63 requires as a key element
unless tress pass has taken place.
22. I proved that I was not the organizer of the events as I was not.
23. That I never took part in any anti-social behaviour or intended or encouraged any other
person to neither.
24. Anti-social behaviour was not clearly caused as a result of the Progress Way by myself or
my actions as I was only a visitor who never caused any offence.
25. I feel as my solicitor you should have my best interest at heart and if you Know a police
officer to be caught for being corrupt for, the evidence that they have supported so that
your client faced a wrongful conviction of any sort you should not encourage them to not
stand up for what is correct and right, so I do not understand why you would ask me to
reconsider whether the attached document should be served on the Respondent.
26. The amendments I made have already been served on the 22/02/2016 and the Judge ask
for the respondent to answer them questions from the 01/02/2016 and the respondent
refuse to do so.
27. I do insist for the challenges to be answered as it is my life that has been tarnished for
civil proceedings, so I do confirm this on writing.
28. I feel that the meeting has been left by yourself to the last minute I have been requesting
this in a multitude of emails to be achieved well in advance to the date that you have now
sited a few days before the appeal, when I know that you have had ample amounts of
time, so if this is the earliest time I will take it and I look forward to meeting Mr Andy
Locke, thank you.
29. I do not see how the case will not get re listed due to lack of disclosure to be quite frank.
30. I do not understand why any solicitor would encourage me to go to trial or appeal and not
draft out the police corruption that you can clearly see in turn making me accept the
clearly fabricated evidence and wrongful conditions that I know have been imposed on
myself under section 63 with no trespass taking place, this being said as for any of the
incidents contained in the Asbo and with you knowing the true facts of them incidents
being contained in private air.
31. There is also that of the clearly fabricated evidence I am standing against as for sure any
solicitor works in Co Hurst towards the understanding of noun precedent in relation to the
weight of any evidence put towards a client. I am concerned about the case, relying sole
on hearsay by police. Is this correct in procedure?