Page 1661 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

2. I want to show the true facts about the case as I am the one who is suffering because of
untrue cut and paste facts that represent the basics of the respondent's case and that singed
evidence being off fabricated police statements, as detailed in the amendments towards your
letter to Sally Gilchrist, whom is already in receipt of such evidence but refuses to act upon
such intelligence in accordance of the law and you advise me to ignore this even low I suffer.
3. I understand that a lot of the matters that should be dealt with at court will be.
4. I still argue for a speedy and fair trial: and feel that when a judge asks the respondent to
reply by a set date such as the 1/08/2016 as the judge HHJ PAWLAK has ordered to happen
it should.
5. The respondent should do so within the time duration as dated 01/09/2016 and agreed with
the judge and then received with the correct response, as has not happened
6. I have been awaiting the reply since 00/02/2016 from an ongoing civil application that is
dated 13th August 2014 so to be able to have a fair trial.
7. After waiting on the 01/-9-2016 with no response I waited till the 2/09/2016 and
telephoned the respondent I spoke with a lady called sally gill Hurst, she states that she has
served some paperwork to my solicitor's at the beginning of august a month prior, after
finishing our conversation I contacted my solicitor she explained to me that she was away on
holiday and that I must wait till she gets back on the 6th September 2016.
8. I again put the phone down and called my solicitor firm's office to see if any paperwork
had been served to be told no.
9. On the 8TH August I spoke with my mother who explained to me that she had been in
contact with my solicitor and that I would
2486,
be reviving a letter to sign to be sent to Sally Gill Hurst. On receiving this letter, it raised the
following concerns.
1. The paperwork has not been served in time.
2. In a preliminary hearing, so to be ready for the appeal the judge ordered this to be
achieved.
3. The respondent has had another 6 months sine 22/02/2016 from the start of the on goings
as dated 13/08/2014
4. We are now at 08/09/2016 the appeal is on the 26/09/2016 this leads me to the concerns of
once again the case being postponed, as it has already been ten times before.
5. I have handed to article Six the right to a speedy and fair trial in regard to some of my
human rights being breached because of the on goings in the ASBO proceedings drafting
clear corruption and fabricated evidence asking for the case to be investigated our the correct
paperwork to be served in accordance to my response to HHJ PAWLAK.
6. Yes, my instructions are clear, I did not organise any illegal raves or provide any
equipment with an intention of holding an illegal rave and surely did not cause any Anti-
Social behaviour on the dates sighted, this is also to include Mill Marsh Lane with no
exception.
7. Yes in some I am visiting my friends who are or were homeless at the time.
8. The legal technicality you state that I refer to i.e. absence of trespass that does not prevent
parties from being held in accordance of the law, may lead to a standalone anti-social
behaviour order if a person commits a public order offence, to which I did not cause as I was
not organizer neither did I take part in the organisation of the party or did I commit any civil
or criminal offence.
9. In any one un-regular occasion over the duration of the weekend I can a understand the
noise nuisance and distress to neighbours this can cause if the allegations were to be true and
not fabricated by police as I can prove. I was not the organizer of the event. The case is based