Page 1663 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

good faith on a pro Bono basis, this being of the understanding that no laws were being
broken and as a Ltd company acting responsible. I know that I should not be liable for them
persons actions when hiring out equipment and having the correct protocols in place as I
clearly do. I do not feel that it is right for the respondent to obtain criminal punishments such
as section 63 of the crime and disorder act 1994 and for that section to be then imposed
against my freedom of movement and many other Human Right that have been breached by
being pro-claimed under wrongful civil proceedings, as for a multitude of incorrect
procedures and legislation that I have occurred, for instance I have no previous nature
offences of a similar sort as required by law when applying a standalone Asbo on a person’s
statue, as I do feel I should of have had the right to challenge the allegations under a true
Criminal investigation, especially when referring to the organisation of illegal raves as the
respondent has clearly headlined the offence to be.
RE SIMON CORDELL V. THE = COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE
METROPOLIS APPEAL AGAINST THE IMPOSITION OF AN ASBO – 26TH
SEPTEMBER 2016 AT 10:00 AM
I write even further with concerns regarding: Your issues of concern dated 08/09/2016 that
was received by email At the Time: 06:00pm, So as towards the letter drafted by yourself and
amended by myself is the response as detailed below, with the listed concerns.
1. I understand that the correct protocols for the offences I am being accused of should be
carried out in a manner to be of a high professional standard as required by law, so for me to
be able to defend myself.
2. I
am therefore not happy with the issues of police corruption not being addressed, by you self
and all other legal persons, as I know I cannot stand a fair trial or appeal without them issues
being rectified first and this is why the amendments have been made to your letter to Sally
GuillHurst. 3. I have suffered since 2014 for conditions that have been wrongfully imposed
upon myself and still awaiting an appeal.
1.1 As my acting solicitor
2488,
you drafted a letter requesting the respondent to remove any CADS that have been placed in
the Asbo bundle served to myself Mr Simon Cordell.
1.1.1 I understand that they cads are already inputted incorrectly and you and the barrister
take note of this, as do , we all achieve this in the understanding that I could not have and did
not commit the alleged offices that I have been accused of that are contained with a vast
majority of other CADS within incorrect and blocked out context; such as the Att Locations
that are un-redacted and do state Crown road and other locations such as Hardy Way, on the
same day as progress way so I could not have committed as I could not be in two places at
once.
1.1.2 There is a further issue in relation to a significant number of Cads that should contain
the Att Locations that have been blocked out such as referred to as retracted and them CADS
that also contain the Grid reference numbers that also prove other locations already.
1.1.3 However I am even further worried about CADS such as all the listed and any in the
format such as fully retracted where know person can, or is able to see the true CAD
intelligence in regards to the wrongful fabricated claims being held against my person, being
so reviled for all to see.
1.1.4 I do believe when all CADS do get retracted and a blocked, then that will help any
barrister and put them in a better position to defend me, so for all Cads and pages in his Asbo
application being served in an unedited format and so for myself to understand the truth, to
why the conditions have been imposed upon myself since the Asbo’s on goings. 2. I am also