Page 1814 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

michael@michaelcarrollandco.Com
then he will obtain funding so that you can be assessed. This will mean writing to the court to
request that the appeal hearing date be vacated until this issue is resolved. If the Psychiatrist's
opinion is that you are fit to participate in the court process, then you can proceed to represent
yourself as you have expressed a desire to do so in the past. If the Psychiatrist's opinion is
that you are not fit to participate in the court process, then the application will be to adjourn
until such time as you are fit to participate in the proceedings. Can you please confirm
whether you will agree to being assessed by 1pm (appointment to be notified in due course)
this afternoon in order that we can notify the court? If you refuse to be assessed, then
Michael Carroll & Co will write to the court to notify them that they are no longer willing to
act as the solicitor / client relationship has irretrievably broken down. If you do not respond
by 1pm this afternoon, Monday 19th September 2016 then Michael Carroll & Co will have
no choice but to write to the court to confirm that there has been an irretrievable break down
in the solicitor / client relationship and you wish to represent yourself. Can you please
communicate by email from now on with Michael Carroll & Co Solicitors?
Yours sincerely
Josephine Ward
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: JOSEPHINE WARD
josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 4:46 PM
Subject: Your appeal at Wood Green Crown Court- 26th September 2016
To: Michael Carroll <lorac999@live.com>
2505,
Simon
Please accept this email as written confirmation that I am no longer prepared to represent
you. I am satisfied that there has been a complete breakdown in solicitor / client relationship.
I also have concerns as to your capacity to follow and participate in the appeal proceedings.
You are unwilling or incapable of listening to advice. You have questioned my professional
and personal integrity. I have represented you for a very long time and continued to represent
you in these proceedings because of the regard and respect that I have for your mother. In
April 2016 I requested that you be assessed by a Psychiatrist or give me access to your
medical notes which you refused to do. You threatened to blacken my name on the Internet if
I raised the issue again. You were recently sectioned in St Anne's hospital and you challenged
that section and were released. I believe that you are not able to listen to advice. I believe that
you are incapable of participating in proceedings. You insist on arguing points that are
irrelevant and detrimental to your case. You do not allow the conferences to move on. The
allegation against you simply is that you organised raves / parties that caused antisocial or
had the potential to cause anti-social behaviour. See schedule forwarded to you on Friday. All
the matters alleged you have already provided instructions and challenges to the allegations.
Put as simply as possible you deny organising, providing sound equipment or sourcing
premises for the purposes of holding raves / Parties. You challenged whether the events in
question are illegal raves as trespass is not present. This argument has no bearing on your
case as you deny and have repeatedly denied sourcing premises, providing equipment or
organising any of the events with the exception of Mill Marsh Lane which you accept you
were present for a small birthday party gathering (again no witness statement / witness details
provided) I have advised you that it is my view that regardless of whether Progress Way was
a private party (LAPSO loophole) or a rave the bottom line is that anti-social behaviour was
caused due to noise nuisance / disorderly conduct. You seek to use the appeal proceedings to
challenge the law by arguing that any person living in a commercial building under a LAPSO