Page 1815 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1815

notice can hold moving in parties. They are not holding a rave as trespass is not present, but
               they are causing anti-social behaviour to neighbouring residents when they hold events that
               cause extreme noise etc. On no occasion during your instructions did you say that you were
               living on the premises, nor did you state that your sound system had been seized. You are
               appealing against the Magistrates Court decision that you organised these events, provided
               sound equipment or sourced premises. You wish to introduce topics that have no bearing to
               the narrow issue which is did you organise or provide equipment for these events, which if
               they went ahead would or had the potential of causing anti-social behaviour. I am under no
               obligation to argue points that are not relevant to your appeal. I have copied Michael Carroll
               in in this email and you must now communicate with him as our relationship has irretrievably
               broken down. The case is listed again for disclosure if required on Wednesday before HHJ
               PAWLAK. A disclosure request must be submitted by Michael Carroll & Co before 4pm on
               Monday 19th September 2016 with the Respondent replying by 20th September 2016.
               Andrew Locke is declining to represent you also as he cannot hold a meaningful conference
               with you. You
               reject advice and have called me a liar.
               2506,
               Simon, your capacity to follow and participate in proceedings needs to be assessed and until
               such time as it is, no solicitor will undertake your case or deal with you, nor will any
               barrister.  I have taken advice from the Law Society on these issues and whilst I cannot
               disclose your recent sectioning to the court / Respondent I can decline to represent you until
               the issue is addressed as can Michael Carroll & Co.  I wish you success in your appeal and I
               regret the breakdown in our solicitor / client relationship.
               Yours sincerely
               Josephine Ward

               2
               The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue: 03
               Case Defence Josephine /
               Page Numbers: 2507,
               Subject: Re: Please read email to Josey and Michael.
               From: Lorraine Cordell (lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk)
               To: re_wired@ymail.com;
               Date: Monday, 19 September 2016, 12:09
               Please confirm I can send you do not need to go into great detail the less the better this is why
               I wrote the email this way.
               Dear Josey / Michael
               I am writing this email due to an email I got from Josey today.  As I said to Josey when she
               called me, I do not have any internet to login to my email so have not read the emails she
               sent, But Josey asked my mother to tell me what was in the email which she has done. And I
               asked her to write this email to you confirming the below.  Josey has asked me to agree to
               have an assessment by a Psychiatrist I do not see the need as I was put under a section 2 on
               the 15/08/2016 and released due to a Tribunal I had on the 26/08/2016.  Since being released
               I have the early intervention team coming to my home to check on my welfare.  I can send
               you the copy of the tribunal release from the section 2. And I can also ask a letter to be
               written from the early intervention team when they attend my home today, which can be
               forwarded to you. I believe this will tell you all that would be needed.
               Regards
               Simon / Lorraine
   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820