Page 639 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

423,
The Appellant will argue that the court was wrong in
principle in granting the original ASBO application as
the Respondent made the original application based on
the Applicant being involved in illegal raves. The
Respondent did not establish this at the initial hearing
and the District Judge erred in granting this ASBO.
The Appellant questions the facts of their being so
many inconsistencies contained within the police
statements, as can be recognized by so many
irregularities that he knows that he has not committed
nor has he had the right to challenge under the criminal
justice acts.
The Appellant feels the need to defend his legal rights
against such allegations of illegal statements and so
many irregularities within the case put against him,
made by police officers against himself the same as he
would if the allegations were made by any member(s)
off the public such as offences off (organizing illegal
raves) In the understanding of civil and criminal law.
The Appellant has learnt in the understanding off all
criminal cases were some think is alleged to have
taken place that is said to have been illegal the correct
Police procedure in them circumstances is that a crime
will be created under the crime and disorder act 1998
by way of a victim or witness making a report then
members of the police will be allocated to the incident
and start investigations depending on the matter of
relevance to the initial report to the resources available
at the time.
The investigations may lead to an arrest what will lead
the detainee to his or her statuary legal rights.
If charged any person’s rights are gained under section
24 and 25 which does relate to the rights of any person
charged and the minimum standards of criminal
procedure. But my case seems to sit in it civil capacity
at court with none of the above regulations and my
rights being carried out in accordance of the United
Kingdom laws; please can you explain this to me?
It has been noted and said by PC. Parcel that the
Applicants is known for class A drugs and or
supplying drugs this was proved not to be true as can
be read in a copy of the magistrate’s court transcripts
and that of the district judge agreeing to take no weight
in such statements, why has this not yet been
deducted?
The Appellant feels as if he is now left with not
understanding, with what has been proven against him
and what he needs to prove for his appeal. As the