Page 644 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 644

nuisance and distress to neighbours this can cause if
                 the allegations were to be true and not fabricated by
                 police as I can prove. I was not the organiser of the
                 event.
                 The case is based on what the respondent based it upon
                 and in my case, this is the Organisation of Illegal
                 Raves not the organisation of raves: -
                 • So, I proved that indoor parties are not illegal unless
                 there is a breach of the licensing act 2003 as this is the
                 law for entertainment.
                 • That the word rave cannot be used by law in a
                 building; such as it has within my case as for sure
                 section 63 requires key elements, one being of the
                 nature that "tress pass must have taken place in private
                 Air" as clearly is not the situations in None of the
                 incidents that I have been found guilty of and now the
                 conditions being imposed upon my statue.
                 • I proved that I was not the organiser to the events as I
                 was not.
                 • That I never took part in any anti-social behaviour or
                 intended or encouraged any other person to neither.
                 • Anti-social behaviour was not clearly caused as a
                 result of the Progress Way by myself or my actions as
                 I was only a visitor who never cased any offence.
                 I feel any legal professional should have the truth and
                 my best interest at heart
                 and if any person Knows a police officer to be caught
                 for being corrupt for the evidence that they have
                 supported so that a human being faced a wrongful
                 convection of any sort that they should encourage
                 them to stand up for what is correct and right.
                 The response I made was already served on the
                 22/02/2016 and the Judge ask for the respondent to
                 answer them questions by the 01/02/2016 and the
                 respondent refuse to do so.
                 3
               428,
                 I do insist for the challenges to be answered as it is my
                 life that has been tarnished for wrongful civil
                 proceedings.
                 I feel that the meeting with my barrister has been left
                 to the last minute to no fault of my own I have been
                 requesting this to be accomplished in a multitude of
                 emails well in advance to the date that has now been
                 made a few days before appeal.
                 I do not see how the case will not get re listed due to
                 lack of late disclosure to be quite frank due to no fault
                 of my own but still at my life's expense.
                 I do not feel that it is right or fair that I am being
                 encouraged to go to appeal and my requests to the
   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649