Page 644 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 644
nuisance and distress to neighbours this can cause if
the allegations were to be true and not fabricated by
police as I can prove. I was not the organiser of the
event.
The case is based on what the respondent based it upon
and in my case, this is the Organisation of Illegal
Raves not the organisation of raves: -
• So, I proved that indoor parties are not illegal unless
there is a breach of the licensing act 2003 as this is the
law for entertainment.
• That the word rave cannot be used by law in a
building; such as it has within my case as for sure
section 63 requires key elements, one being of the
nature that "tress pass must have taken place in private
Air" as clearly is not the situations in None of the
incidents that I have been found guilty of and now the
conditions being imposed upon my statue.
• I proved that I was not the organiser to the events as I
was not.
• That I never took part in any anti-social behaviour or
intended or encouraged any other person to neither.
• Anti-social behaviour was not clearly caused as a
result of the Progress Way by myself or my actions as
I was only a visitor who never cased any offence.
I feel any legal professional should have the truth and
my best interest at heart
and if any person Knows a police officer to be caught
for being corrupt for the evidence that they have
supported so that a human being faced a wrongful
convection of any sort that they should encourage
them to stand up for what is correct and right.
The response I made was already served on the
22/02/2016 and the Judge ask for the respondent to
answer them questions by the 01/02/2016 and the
respondent refuse to do so.
3
428,
I do insist for the challenges to be answered as it is my
life that has been tarnished for wrongful civil
proceedings.
I feel that the meeting with my barrister has been left
to the last minute to no fault of my own I have been
requesting this to be accomplished in a multitude of
emails well in advance to the date that has now been
made a few days before appeal.
I do not see how the case will not get re listed due to
lack of late disclosure to be quite frank due to no fault
of my own but still at my life's expense.
I do not feel that it is right or fair that I am being
encouraged to go to appeal and my requests to the

