Page 646 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 646

and Disorder act 1994 and for that section to be then
                 imposed against my freedom of movement & other
                 Human Right
                 that have been breached by being pro-claimed under
                 wrongful civil proceedings, as I have now suffered to a
                 multitude of incorrect procedures, legalisation and
                 wrongful claims that I have occurred, for instance I
                 have no previous nurtured offences of a similar sort as
                 required by law when applying a standalone Asbo on a
                 person's statue, as I do feel I should have. Also, the
                 case has made me feel that I have not had the right to
                 challenge the allegations under a true Criminal
                 investigation, especially when referring to the
                 Organisation of Illegal Raves as the respondent has
                 clearly headlined the offence to be.
                 I also have the listed concerns of: -
                 12.    I understand that the correct protocols for the
                 offences I am being accused of should be carried out in
                 a manner to be of a high professional standard as
                 required by law, so for me to be able to defend myself.
                 13.    I am therefore not happy with the issues of
                 police corruption not being addressed, by all legal
                 persons, as I know I cannot stand a fair trial or appeal
                 without them issues being rectified first.
                 14.    I have suffered since 2014 for conditions that
                 have been wrongful imposed upon myself and still
                 awaiting an appeal.
                 • Me and my acting solicitor drafted a letter requesting
                 the respondent to remove any CADS that have been
                 placed in the Asbo bundle, as I understand that the
                 cads are already inputted incorrectly, leading to the
                 further understanding that I could not have and did not
                 commit the alleged offices that I have been accused of
                 as a fast majority of the other CADS contained within
                 the application are incorrect and them cads do have
                 some blocked out context; such as the Att Locations
                 that are redacted and the intelligence reports grid
                 references do state Crown road and other locations
                 such as Hardy Way, on the same day as progress way
                 so I could not have committed as I could not be in two
                 places at once.
                 24.11.2013 However, I am even further worried about
                 CADS such as all the listed and any in the format such
                 as fully retracted where know person can or is able to
                 see the true CAD intelligence in regards to the
                 wrongful fabricated claims being held against my
                 person, so for all to be able to see the truth.
                 24.11.2014 I do believe when all CADS do get retracted
                 and un blocked then that will help any barrister and put
                 them in a better position to defend me, so for all Cads
   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651