Page 676 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 676

offered to create an injunction for myself against the police to which they once were them
               self's.
               Andy lock the barrister that you hired also agrees in his substitution in regards to the points of
               law that I have been asking you to act on since the start of this case I have the emails as do
               you of you.
               What I am willing to do is pay for my own private psychiatrist opinion and forward that to
               yourself if need be, please can you contact me and tell me if I need to book an appointment
               with one ASAP, so I can get your help in continuing my case.


               32.
               Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
               32. 1. 2
               Asbo Re R v Simon Appeal Letter 25-02-2016 10-41
               25/02/2016
               / Page Numbers: 470,471
               --
               470,
               From: Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com>
               Sent time: 25/02/2016 10:41:09 AM
               To: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
               Subject: Re: Re: R v Simon Cordell Appeal Letter
               Will you take this back to court so I can get my life back I have been locked in my house for
               two years because I listened to your guidance the documents I sent you are right I am being
               held against my rights.
               Please contact me in regard to my last emails to yourself as you leave me worried.
               On Wednesday, 24 February 2016, 19:54, Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com> wrote:
               Please can you reply as what you have said has left me with concerns.
               All I want is a fair trial and a professional good relationship with yourself. I ask for legal
               guidance off yourself. I have created a bundle with the relevant back bone points of law,
               relevant to my case and a shorter up dated statement, I have also made a skeleton argument
               out of the docs you have provided me with up to date. at this time I would like you to apply to
               the court so that I can have the ASBO conditions defined as trespass was not present for
               section 63 conditions to be imposed, neither was there any breach of the licencing act 2003 as
               amended Jan 7th 2013 and 2016, also proofing the fact that the applicants case of illegal
               raves, could not be correct in law. please see a copy of the licencing act 2003 attached that
               clearly states that all house party’s or private parties are not regulated and do not need a
               licence and there for not illegal. I would also like the right under article 6 of my human rights
               to be called as I do not feel that it is possible with the only evidence the police rely on not
               only to be incorrect in law but that of a fabricated evidence by way of the time stamps and
               other relevant errors such as PC Elesmore stating under oath to the district judge that any
               location blocked out or within the applicants bundle, are that off progress way, when we have
               clearly proved otherwise. Please see a draft copy of my backbone points of law attached. The
               folder I have attached proves that illegal raves was not possible to be present, as the police
               have no power on private parties, until the local authority applies at the local court to give the
               police such powers such as a section 80 noise abatement notice, which has not been served
               within any of the dates in question contained within the applicants  bundle, I believe this
               is why the local council never turns up to any of the court hearings which they are bound by
               law to do so, as I would like them to attended and answer such questions. please can you
   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681