Page 672 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

to do so, as I would like them to attended and answer such questions. please can you reply to
my points in the last 3 emails in bullion points so I can understand your legal guidance.
On Wednesday, 24 February 2016, 18:09, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
wrote:
Dear Josey
You have not attached any paperwork so we cannot see what has been said by the judge or
the barrister that was there can this be forwarded please.
Josey at court the judge would not hear what the barrister for Simon was saying or anyone
else this case went in and out of court. I asked if I could speak to the judge myself which he
took no notice off when a note was written by a person in the court and handed to the clerk to
pass to the judge.
For Appeal against Conviction - Case Started - 10:19
For Appeal against Conviction - Respondent Case Opened - 10:50
For Appeal against Conviction - Case adjourned until - 11:20 - 11:08
For Appeal against Conviction - Resume - 11:29
For Appeal against Conviction - Case adjourned until - 11:50 - 11:41
For Appeal against Conviction - Resume - 11:43
For Appeal against Conviction - Hearing finished for SIMON PAUL CORDELL - 11:58 And
there was one more time that the judge went out in fact it could have been 2.
And as even the barrister said to us the judge was not hearing what we wanted to say or he
would have understood all the judge wanted to do was make this case go ahead even when
Simon Barrister was saying it could not, at this point it was not due to Simon heath. it was
other reasons that the barrister felt uncomfortable going ahead.
If the judge had heard what was being said and was being fair, then at that point it should
have been put off as the barrister had very good reason for it not to go ahead.
It was at this point I asked the lady to write a note to the judge to ask if I could speak which
she did and it was pasted to the judge, and the judge took no notice of it.
Simon has had an assessment from the mental health team on I believe 03/02/2016 as you are
well aware as Simon told you himself in the office. the warrant was granted on the
25/01/2016 but they never used it until the 03/02/2016
He agreed that he would work with them and have meetings with Goody. The judge does not
know any of this because he would not let me speak in court.
Also have you heard yet from Superintendent Adrian Coombs I believe from what you said to
me on the phone he was meant to be getting a reply from him on Monday
Regards
Lorraine
From: Josephine Ward mailto: josie@michaelcarroNandco.com
Sent: 24 February 2016 16:19
To: re_wired@ymail.com
Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Fwd.: Re: R v Simon Cordell Appeal Letter
448,
Dear Simon / Lorraine
am forwarding across to you a letter that I have received from HHJ Pawlak, who will be
adjudicating at the appeal hearing on 26th September 2016. He will also be presiding over the
mention hearing on 4th April2016.
The first point that must be addressed in question 3 and this concerns your mental health
Simon and your fitness to follow proceedings, instruct solicitors and consider advice. I am
therefore going to apply for funding so that you can be assessed so that this area can be