Page 668 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

I await hearing from you by return email.
Yours sincerely
Josephine Ward MICHAEL CARROLL & CO.
Original Message
From: Patrick Mc Elligott <patrick@michaelcarrollandco.com>
To: josie@michaelcarrollandco.com
Date: 24 February 2016 at 14:33
Subject: Re: R v Simon Cordell Appeal Letter
Hi,
Please find attached.
Regards.

27.
Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
27. 1. 2
Asbo Re R v Simon Cor Appeal Letter 24-02-2016 16-19
24/02/2016
/ Page Numbers: 444
--
444,
From: Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com>
Sent time: 24/02/2016 04:18:47 PM
To: re_wired@ymail.com
Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Fwd.: Re: R v Simon Cordell Appeal Letter
Dear Simon / Lorraine
I am forwarding across to you a letter that I have received from HHJ Pawlak, who will be
adjudicating at the appeal hearing on 26th September 2016. He will also be presiding over the
mention hearing on 4th April 2016.
The first point that must be addressed in question 3 and this concerns your mental health
Simon and your fitness to follow proceedings, instruct solicitors and consider advice. I am
therefore going to apply for funding so that you can be assessed so that this area can be
clarified. This is important. Your behaviour in court on Monday raised a number of concerns
surrounding this point.
The second point is answering and responding to question 2. This question can only be
properly addressed once we receive confirmation from a Psychiatrist that you are able to
follow proceedings etc
Paragraph 4 makes it clear that the Court will not allow Michael Carroll & Co to come off the
record unless the Senior Partner attends in person. We cannot advance your case or respond
to question 2 until such time as the psychiatric confirms that there are no issues with your
ability to follow proceedings.
You will note the areas that the court wishes to concentrate on are listed in paragraph 2. All
the points will have to be carefully considered; in my view they are loaded questions that are
seeking to achieve foundation for the ASBO application. The Judge is referring to events but
in brackets using the word rave. He is not stating illegal rave. There are five subsections but
ultimately subsection 2(c) is probably the question that Judge is most interested in knowing
your response to.
Paragraph 4 makes it clear that the Court will not allow Michael Carroll & Co to come off the
record unless the Senior Partner attends in person or unless you wish to transfer legal aid.