Page 670 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

If the judge had heard what was being said and was being fair, then at that point it should
have been put off as the barrister had very good reason for it not to go ahead.
It was at this point I asked the lady to write a note to the judge to ask if I could speak which
she did and it was pasted to the judge, and the judge took no notice of it.
Simon has had an assessment from the mental health team on I believe 03/02/2016 as you are
well aware as Simon told you himself in the office. the warrant was granted on the
25/01/2016 but they never used it until the 03/02/2016
He agreed that he would work with them and have meetings with Goody. The judge does not
know any of this because he would not let me speak in court.
Also have you heard yet from Superintendent Adrian Coombs I believe from what you said to
me on the phone he was meant to be getting a reply from him on Monday
Regards
Lorraine
From: Josephine Ward [mailto: josie@michaelcarroNandco.com
Sent: 24 February 2016 16:19
To: re_wired@ymail.com
Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Fwd.: Re: R v Simon Cordell Appeal Letter
Dear Simon / Lorraine
I am forwarding across to you a letter that I have received from HHJ Pawlak, who will be
adjudicating at the appeal hearing on 26th September 2016. He will also be presiding over the
mention hearing on 4th April2016.
The first point that must be addressed in question 3 and this concerns your mental health
Simon and your fitness to follow proceedings, instruct solicitors and consider advice. I am
therefore going to apply for funding so that you can be assessed so that this area can be
clarified. This is important. Your behaviour in court on Monday raised a number of concerns
surrounding this point.
The second point is answering and responding to question 2. This question can only be
properly addressed once we receive confirmation from a Psychiatrist that you are able to
follow proceedings etc
Paragraph 4 makes it clear that the Court will not allow Michael Carroll & Co to come off the
record unless the Senior Partner attends in person. We cannot advance your case or respond
to question 2 until such time as the psychiatric confirms that there are no issues with your
ability to follow proceedings.
446,
You will note the areas that the court wishes to concentrate on are listed in paragraph 2. All
the points will have to be carefully considered; in my view they are loaded questions that are
seeking to achieve foundation for the ASBO application. The Judge is referring to events but
in brackets using the word rave. He is not stating illegal rave. There are five subsections but
ultimately subsection 2(c) is probably the question that Judge is most interested in knowing
your response to.
Paragraph 4 makes it clear that the Court will not allow Michael Carroll & Co to come off the
record unless the Senior Partner attends in person or unless you wish to transfer legal aid.
Paragraph 5 deals with the hearsay application to be served by the respondent.
Superintendent Coombes is forwarding his statement in the post. I will forward this on
receipt.
Can you please confirm by return email Simon whether you are willing to be assessed by a
Psychiatrist so that we can determine whether you are fit to follow proceedings.
I await hearing from you by return email.
Yours sincerely