Page 669 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Paragraph 5 deals with the hearsay application to be served by the respondent.
Superintendent Coombes is forwarding his statement in the post. I will forward this on
receipt.
Can you please confirm by return email Simon whether you are willing to be assessed by a
Psychiatrist so that we can determine whether you are fit to follow proceedings.
I await hearing from you by return email.
Yours sincerely
Josephine Ward MICHAEL CARROLL & CO.
Original Message
From: Patrick Mc Elligott <patrick@michaelcarrollandco.com>
To: josie@michaelcarrollandco.com
Date: 24 February 2016 at 14:33
Subject: Re: R v Simon Cordell Appeal Letter
Hi,
Please find attached.
Regards.

28.
Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
28. 1. 2
Asbo Re R v Simon Cor Appeal Letter 24-02-2016 18-09
24/02/2016
/ Page Numbers: 445,446
--
445,
From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
Sent time: 24/02/2016 06:09:29 PM
To: Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarroUandco.com>; Rewired <re_wired@ymail.com>
Subject: RE: Re: R v Simon Cordell Appeal Letter
Dear Josey
You have not attached any paperwork so we cannot see what has been said by the judge or
the barrister that was there can this be forwarded please.
Josey at court the judge would not hear what the barrister for Simon was saying or anyone
else this case went in and out of court. I asked if I could speak to the judge myself which he
took no notice off when a note was written by a person in the court and handed to the clerk to
pass to the judge.
For Appeal against Conviction - Case Started - 10:19
For Appeal against Conviction - Respondent Case Opened - 10:50
For Appeal against Conviction - Case adjourned until - 11:20 - 11:08
For Appeal against Conviction - Resume - 11:29
For Appeal against Conviction - Case adjourned until - 11:50 - 11:41
For Appeal against Conviction - Resume - 11:43
For Appeal against Conviction - Hearing finished for SIMON PAUL CORDELL - 11:58 And
there was one more time that the judge went out in fact it could have been 2.
And as even the barrister said to us the judge was not hearing what we wanted to say or he
would have understood all the judge wanted to do was make this case go ahead even when
Simon Barrister was saying it could not, at this point it was not due to Simon heath. it was
other reasons that the barrister felt uncomfortable going ahead.