Page 758 - 7. 2016 Last three months the 10 - 11 - 12 No Table
P. 758

The First Housing Possession Order Book
               / Page Numbers: 7
               22nd November 2016   22/11/2016

                                 The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
                                 NOSP - Simon Cordell Possession
                                      “From Council History”
                                             19/07/2017
                                               NOSP
                   served on Mr. Cordell today at 4.05pm with Enfield Highway
                                      DWOs, copy attachment
                 / Page Numbers: 3267,3268,3269,3270,3271,3272,3273,3274,3275,
                                     3275 + 1,3276,3277,3278,


                                 Particulars of 31 alleged Breaches

                 Page  (8)                       1. Particulars of Breaches (8)
                 3273    On 22nd November        Reply:
                        2016 during a telephone
                         conversation between
                         you, Mrs Cordell your
                         mother and Ms Sarah
                               Fletcher,
                        neighbourhood officer,
                         Ms. Fletcher reported
                         that she overheard you
                         threaten her by saying
                        ‘I’m gonna do her over’
                          and then ‘I’m gonna
                          take her job just for
                                 fun’.

                 Reply:
                 2.  Particulars of Breaches (8)
                 Reply:
                 Sarah Fletcher neighbourhood officer from the council claims that on
                 22nd November 2016
                 during a telephone conversation between her, myself and mother that
                 she overheard me threaten her by saying 'I'm going to do her over' and
                 then 'I'm going to take her job just for fun'.
                 This is not true
                 The reason that it is not true is because what has now been stated to
                 have occurred is more than just misinterpreted information of the so
                 called Mid – day event.
                 The Council’s memo of a telephone call on that day:
                 Is  forged  and  therefore  incorrect  and  is  not  supported  by  self  and
                 mother to be true facts that have been documented with a fair prosses
                 by  the  statement  maker.  The  context  contained  within  side  the
                 statement had been fabricated so to support the claimants claim.
   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763