Page 759 - 7. 2016 Last three months the 10 - 11 - 12 No Table

While also set out to avoid displinary action for the statement makers
and hardworking colleague’s incompetence leading to negligence and
gross misconduct, set out against myself and then on afterwards having
a negative effect also within my loved one’s life’s.
All what has been achieved by the Enfield Council since the start of
my official complaint to themselves has gotten managed with criminal
intention to put I in harm’s way
From the of start of themselves handling my case load of an official
work load.
Sarah Fletcher as mentioned whom once was a neighbourhood officer
who did work in collaboration with the Enfield Council, states that she
received a call from Mr. Simon Paul Cordell
Whom is an Enfield secure resident within his housing tenancy that is
attached to the address of 109 Burncroft Avenue at around the time of
Mid – Day: 01:20Pm?
The time that Sarah Fletcher states she received the phone call is
incorrect but not by far even low it is still 100% incorrect. I and my
Mother am sure of this as we cared very much so when deciding to
make the phone call to my housing officer that we both documented
down all relevant information accurately.
When doing so we noted down the precise time of 01:04Pm
I did get transferred by customer services when making the phone call
to my housing officer about the way I was getting victimised, this did
not take too long.
Once on the phone to Sarah Fletcher I started to explain to her a shorted
down list of emergency issues that I was having wile renting my home.
1. That my mother had been contacting her and her team, while also
contacting other official persons with relevance since the date of
00/00/2015
And this had continued up a till date and without any fair follow up’s
as company protocol states is mandatory.
And due to this lack of concern I had continued to suffer for a much
further time frame than ever would have been if her and other persons
jobs were followed correctly.
2.
3.
4.
5.
. 1.20pm.
The call was transferred by the customer services team informing me
that Mr. Cordell wished to discuss his housing option show to move.
I took the call- he sounded agitated and said that he had a few things
that he wished to discuss with me.
He said he was calling in response to a letter that I had sent him
requesting the removal of a CCTV camera that he had installed on the
inner communal/fire door on the ground floor of the block.
He informed me that he would not be removing the camera as he
believed he was legally allowed to have the camera as the communal
area was his.