Page 267 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table 1st Half

This is not the only time you have brought up the conditions the lower court set Mr Cordell
when they granted the ASBO order on the 04/08/2015 after the full hearing.
We felt you was only worried about the conditions so in fact had made your mind up there
was only issues with the conditions when in fact you have not even heard the Appeal. So why
are you even talking about the conditions and what you believed where problems with the
conditions that where set by the lower court, before even hearing the Appeal.
There was more worrying issue such as my son having a solicitor and an acting barrister for
the Appeal hearing and legal Aid in place for the acting solicitors.
Your Horner knew after the last solicitor was removed from record by yourself on the
21/09/2016 when we had notified the court we were going to be late to court by 5 or 10
minutes due to traffic, by the time we got to court you had already removed the solicitors
while we were not there from record.
We were told this by the acting barrister the solicitor had sent who waited at court till we got
there to inform us you had granted their application they could be removed from record.
We were told by the barrister to wait at court that you would call us into court to talk to us
which we did and was called into court around 16:00 hours as you were dealing with other
trial.
On being called into court you were told by the Respondent Barrister this was not the only
time the solicitors had put an application to be removed from record this had been done on
the 19/02/2016 again just before the trial was due to start on the 22/02/2016 and had been
dismissed by His Honour Judge Morrison sitting that day and notes put by His Honour Judge
Morrison, If any attempt is made to repeat this application the Court will require it to be made
in person by the Senior Partner of Michael Carroll & Co. You said you could not force a
solicitor to act against their will, but no acting Senior Partner of Michael Carroll & Co was in
court.
We at this point we asked for an adjournment of the 3 day Appeal hearing that was due to
start on the 26/09/2016 to get a new solicitor put in place which you refused to do and stated
my son could do this himself, there was great concern with this due to my son’s learning
problems not being able to read and write and health problems which you was aware of.
In fact my son could not even attend court due to this on the 26/09/2016 due to what this had
done to him and made him so ill I had to write a letter to yourself which on the 26/09/2016
had to be addressed by you.
22,
Letter-to-Judge-18-01-2017.doc
At that hearing I told you I had spent days calling solicitors trying to get one put in place and
no one would take the case on due to this being at appeal stage and how much legal Aid paid
for appeal hearings and I was being told we would have to pay private to get a solicitor so my
son could have a barrister put in place for the appeal hearing to act for him, you said due to
the letter I had written you had 3 option open to you and believed this would go to judicial
review.
1. Carry on with the Appeal hearing in the hope my son would turn up the next day
27/09/2016.
2. Dismiss the Appeal.
3. Adjourn the Appeal to a later date.
You choose to adjourn the Appeal to a later date to start on the 16/01/2017
Issues were also raised about the bundles we were working from which were old Respondent
bundles and files being missing. We had worked that out when waiting to be called into court
with the Respondent barrister. You order that the solicitor hand the bundles over to us that
day. And set a date for us to come back to court to check we were all working from the same
bundles. I believe this date was the 14/10/2016.