Page 271 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table 1st Half

Mr Simon Cordell will not accept the file or paperwork that was put in his letter box and
there for have not be rightly served.
I would like this issue looked into and to be informed if there is any paperwork missing from
the folder which have full details and information to Mr Simon Cordell and other people.
Regards
Miss L Cordell

6.
Additional Email Attachments & Emails / Issue:
6. 1. 2.
Mother 18-01-2017 -09-24
18/01/2017
/ Page Numbers: 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38
--
28,
From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
Sent time: 18/01/2017 09:24:18 AM
To: re_wired@ymail.com
Subject: Re: Updated letter Letter-to-HHJ PAWLAK-18-01-2017.pdf
Property-Receipt-and-cad-information-for-handing-back-documents.pdf
Simon-police-complaint-
Attachments: 13-09-2014.pdf
here is what has been sent as I missed a few things out.
29,
Letter-to-HHJ PAWLAK-18-01-2017.pdf
18/01/2016
Your Horner HHJ PAWLAK
I am written this letter after yesterday 17/01/2017 being in court and felt as did 3 other people
there is no point carrying on with this Appeal as you have already made you mind up before
even hearing the Appeal.
This is not the only time you have brought up the conditions the lower court set Mr Cordell
when they granted the ASBO order on the 04/08/2015 after the full hearing.
We felt you was only worried about the conditions so in fact had made your mind up there
was only issues with the conditions when in fact you have not even heard the Appeal. So why
are you even talking about the conditions and what you believed where problems with the
conditions that where set by the lower court, before even hearing the Appeal.
There was more worrying issue such as my son having a solicitor and an acting barrister for
the Appeal hearing and legal Aid in place for the acting solicitors.
Your Horner knew after the last solicitor was removed from record by yourself on the
21/09/2016 when we had notified the court we were going to be late to court by 5 or 10
minutes due to traffic, by the time we got to court you had already removed the solicitors
while we were not there from record.
We were told this by the acting barrister the solicitor had sent who waited at court till we got
there to inform us you had granted their application they could be removed from record.
We were told by the barrister to wait at court that you would call us into court to talk to us
which we did and was called into court around 16:00 hours as you were dealing with other
trial.
On being called into court you were told by the Respondent Barrister this was not the only
time the solicitors had put an application to be removed from record this had been done on