Page 347 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table 1st Half

2
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
710. Martin Jenkin_RE_ Simon Cordell_ (5)
/ Page Numbers: 2771,
From: Martin Jenkin [martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com]
Sent: 23 January 2017 09:54
To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Hi Lorraine,
Unfortunately, I have no recordings of the original call, but I have had a conversation with
the police complaints and confirmed that no tools were mentioned in the original call.
Regards
Martin
From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 22 January 2017 13:09
To: 'Martin Jenkin' <martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com>
Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Dear Martin
As you know the case in 2013 when the police lied to KGM about my Son Simon Cordell,
this case is still ongoing under complaint re the police officer. As part of their investigation
they were meant to have contacted you to get a report of the 1st phone call that was made on
that day which was to you by Simon where Simon passed his phone to the police officer for
you to speak to and you told the police officer Simon was insured and the police officer never
said anything about any tools. It was after this the police officer felt the need to contact KGM
and say what he did to make Simon insurance void so he could do what he wanted. This was
not done by the 1st investigation and a reinvestigation in now ongoing. I was wondering if
you kept the audio of phone calls made to Broadsure and if so, could a copy be made of that
call. If not, could you write something up so it could be passed to the investigating officer. As
I sure notes should still be on file. If you could get back to me in regards to this I would be
most grateful.
Regards
Lorraine Cordell

3
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
711. Jamie.Newman@met.pnn
/ Page Numbers: 2772,2773,
From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk
Sent: 23 January 2017 10:24
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: RE: PC/6804/13
Attachments: Cordell JN_email_pc.6804.13.pdf
Good Morning,
You are correct, I am to re‐investigate the matter. I look forward to working with you to bring
this matter to a satisfactory conclusion. Early in December I wrote to Mr Cordell though
received no reply. I wrote to him again in early January though again received no reply. If
you’re dealing with this matter on his behalf then that explains it. Am I to?
assume I’m to communicate with you going forward?
I’ve attached the letter I sent to Mr Cordell. I’d appreciate it if you could respond to my
request at your earliest convenience. Any questions please do ask.