Page 350 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table 1st Half

extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by
monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement
on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised
agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any
attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious
software infection and corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the
Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS).
Find us at:
Facebook: Facebook.com/metpolice.uk
Twitter: @metpolice.uk

5
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
713. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell_ (30)
/ Page Numbers: 2776,2777,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 23 January 2017 10:24
To: 'Martin Jenkin'
Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Dear Martin
Thank you so much not sure why the police did not get in contact with you when they did the
1st investigation.
Regards
Lorraine
From: Martin Jenkin [mailto: martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com]
Sent: 23 January 2017 09:54
To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Hi Lorraine,
Unfortunately, I have no recordings of the original call, but I have had a conversation with
the police complaints and confirmed that no tools were mentioned in the original call.
Regards
Martin
From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 22 January 2017 13:09
To: 'Martin Jenkin' <martinjenkin@broadsuredirect.com>
Subject: RE: Simon Cordell
Dear Martin
As you know the case in 2013 when the police lied to KGM about my Son Simon Cordell,
this case is still ongoing under complaint re the police officer. As part of their investigation
they were meant to have contacted you to get a report of the 1st phone call that was made on
that day which was to you by Simon where Simon passed his phone to the police officer for
you to speak to and you told the police officer Simon was insured and the police officer never
said anything about any tools. It was after this the police officer felt the need to contact KGM
and say what he did to make Simon insurance void so he could do what he wanted. This was
not done by the 1st investigation and a reinvestigation in now ongoing. I was wondering if
you kept the audio of phone calls made to Broadsure and if so, could a copy be made of that
call. If not, could you write something up so it could be passed to the investigating officer. As