Page 958 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table 1st Half
P. 958

Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR
               'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’
               From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
               Sent: 31 January 2017 10:37
               To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards
               <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>
               Subject: RE: PC/6804/13
               Dear Jamie Newman,
               Thank you for the below email. I believe you have spoken to Martin Jenkins and he has
               confirmed with you that when Mr Cordell was spoken to by the police officer, Mr Cordell
               used his phone to call Martin Jenkins and Martin Jenkins confirmed he told the police officer
               Mr Cordell was insured to drive, and also the police officer never said anything about any
               tools to him on that phone call. I also made calls that day as my son also called me what was
               going on. I have asked many times to see a copy of the police officer note book, as until I saw
               the report from Jeanette Reilly, and it was confirmed the police officer did in fact have a note
               book, Mr Cordell always said he took notes but the police officer even said in court he never
               and it was only the ticket he had used that day. The reason for asking for a copy is due to the
               fact of the name my son give and it is stated in his note book a name was given, then it
               seemed to change to Mr Cordell saying he was homeless, but the police officer would have
               done checks of the name given, which I believe the note book proves my son give his correct
               name as there was no reason for him not to have done as he never done anything wrong. and
               this would have been confirmed when the police officer done his police checks. There is also
               one other issue and that is when Mr Cordell asked for an inspector to be called due to what
               the police officer had said to the insurance company. Mr Cordell was telling the inspector that
               the police officer had lied to his insurance company about tools being in the vane, all it would
               have took was for the inspector to check the van at that time, he would have then seen
               something was really wrong as there was no tools and would have seen this, and this could
               have been addressed there and then without the need for my son to have been arrested. If
               there is anything you need for me please let me know.
               Regards
               Lorraine Cordell
               From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
               Sent: 30 January 2017 12:56
               To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
               Subject: RE: PC/6804/13
               Hello Ms Cordell,
               I hope this email finds you well. Have you had a chance to look at the document attached to
               my last email?
               2996,
               Kind regards
               Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional
               Standards |
               Met Phone 786675
               Telephone 0207 161 6675
               Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
               Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR
               From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
               Sent: 23 January 2017 13:58
               To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards
               <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>
   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963