Page 963 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table 1st Half

The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
764. Abigail.T.Akano@met.pnn
/ Page Numbers: 3002,3003,
From: Abigail.T.Akano@met.pnn.police.uk on behalf of DPA Mailbox.
SAR@met.pnn.police.uk
Sent: 28 February 2017 11:36
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: RE: Subject Access Request
Attachments: Speculative search letters.doc
Dear Miss Cordell
Please find the attached letters with regards to my phone call and your email below. This is
not a refusal, as
explained, Subject Access Request have to be specific request. The system does not just work
by searching on names as you have expressed. I await each redefined request. The application
has been stopped until I receive your redefined requests.
Yours sincerely
Abigail Akano | Privacy Assistant |Strategy & Insight |Strategy & Governance| METHQ |
Metropolitan Police
Service
Protective Marking: Not Protectively Marked
Not Suitable for Publication:
Recipients of this email should be aware that all communications within and to and from the
Metropolitan Police Service are subject to consideration for release under the Data Protection
Act, Freedom of Information Act and Environmental Information Regulations. The MPS will
consider information for release unless there is valid and proportionate public interest
|reasons not to, therefore, sensitive information not for public disclosure must be highlighted
as such. Further advice can be obtained from the Information Rights Unit ‐ 783500.
From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 27 February 2017 18:44
To: SAR Mailbox ‐ Online Applications <SARonlineapplications@met.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: RE: Subject Access Request
To Whom It May Concern:
I got a phone call today from someone dealing with the 4 subject access requests that were
submitted for
Mr. Simon Cordell: (submitted on the 07/02/2017)
Mr. Tyrone Benjamin: (submitted on the 08/02/2017)
Miss Deon Benjamin: (submitted on the 08/02/2017)
Miss Lorraine Cordell: (submitted on the 08/02/2017)
I was told that a letter was going to be sent out stating that the way in which I have filed the
subject access request is not by dates and that dates would be needed to complete the
requests. I said to the lady how can we give you dates there is to many of them, far to many
for us to remember as this is going back over 23 years of data we have requested, as we want
all data that is held about us by police. This is when the lady said that she will send me a
letter stating I had to update my request. Could the lady please be asked who called me today
if this letter can be sent via my email. I have spoken to the ICO explained what has been said
and even the lady cannot believe I am being asked to
3003,
supply 23 years of dates, and can it also be confirmed if this is a refusal of the 4 subject
access request that have been submitted. We want to move this forward, and we have the