Page 231 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All

Location: ELLESMERE STREET, LONDON E14 (01HT)
Disposal: 23/07/13 AT EAST LONDON MAGISTRATES
COURT REF: 13/2574/60295A
1 WITHDRAWN FINAL
24/05/2013 Old Police Station Ponders End:
On this date it is alleged by the police the claimant was looking for venues in which illegal
raves could be held.
This is far from the truth on this date, I was contacted via phone by a person called Joshua,
Joshua was homeless and at that time was staying at 204 High Street, Ponders End EN3 4EZ,
this building is also known as the old police station, Joshua had contacted me due to being
hungry and in need of food, he told him he would come and meet him in order to take him
out and get some food as he had no money.
As the claimant approached 204 high Road the police stopped him, the claimant consented to
being searched and having his car searched due to the police stating there was a strong smell
of cannabis, the police did their search and found nothing. The police asked where he was
going which he told them, he was going to meet a friend to get some food.
The claimant disputes stating to police that he could attract people to illegal raves and three
day events, the claimant does not know what Joshua said to the police so cannot comment on
this as he was not with Joshua when the police were questioning Joshua.
This date is also outside of the six months’ time limit from when the application was
submitted to the court, again the judge has proved this case when this case is only meant to be
used as reference, and the claimant did not cause any anti-social behaviour on the 24th May
2013. Why are these cases being proven/
20/04/2014 Cannabis 420 day:
Within Steve Elsmore statement dated 11/08/2014, it is made to seem that the claimant
attended on this date without the knowledge of the organisers of this event and was not hired
to be there by the event organiser’s norm-co.uk. In fact he was hired by norm-co.uk to attend
the event that they had organised the claimant believes this event is legal and happens every
year. The claimant was hired on a dry hire basis; the claimant was doing the job on a no profit
basis. When norm-co.uk contacted the claimant he was told that the person that they had
hired had let them down at the last minute.
The claimant arrived at the location in Hyde Park he was approached by the police, the
claimant explained why he was there that he had been hired by the organisers, the police
stated to him he had not been hired by the organisers of the event, and that he was not
supposed to be there, when the claimant was hired by the organisers norm- co.uk they told
him that this was a licensed event. The claimant did not use his
2229
211,
Letter to high court C0 2171 2017.pdf
equipment he did try to contact the organisers of the event but was unable to, the claimant left
the location as the police had asked him to do and returned home.
Within the claimant’s bundle there are emails to prove the above account of what the
claimant has stated these emails are from norm-co.uk. The claimant did not cause any anti-
social behaviour on the 20th April 2014.
• 25/05/2014 Unit 5 St Georges Ind Est White hart Lane, N17:
In respect to this date the claimant did attend premises where homeless people was treating it
as their home, the claimant had attended bringing food for the homeless people living in the
premises, when the claimant got to the premises the homeless people was already in the
premises living there, there was no music being played while he was present.