Page 233 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All

The claimant was not involved in organising or supplying any equipment at progress way.
The claimant did not act in any anti-social behaviour manner on the 06/06/2014, 07/06/2014
and the 08/06/2014.
Within ASBO application most of the data relates to Progress Way which relates to the dates
of the 06/06/2014, 07/06/2014 and the 08/06/2014.
The police stated that the information contained within their bundle does not relate to another
location and deny that an event was ongoing just down the road from progress way on the
same dates as progress way, this was even stated under oath at court. The police denied that
there was another event ongoing in Crown Road at the same time that Progress Way was
ongoing.
They even confirmed to the judge when the Judge asked if anything related to another
location, it was stated to the Judge everything that related to 06/06/2014, 07/06/2014 and the
08/06/2014 within their bundle related to progress way that nothing within the bundle for
Progress Way related to another event.
A huge amount of data has been redacted by the police, I could understand if the redacted
data only redacted the person’s details name and address phone numbers etc that had made
the calls to the police. But the redaction goes a lot further than this where there is whole
pages redacted within one CAD which really makes the CAD useless being in the bundle,
also the grid references why would so many be redacted I can understand the call location
being redacted but why would there be a need to redact the Att Location and Inc Loc. We
asked every time we were in court for the CADs
2231
213,
Letter to high court C0 2171 2017.pdf
to be un-redacted because we knew a fair amount related to Crown Road, which the police
were denying, we also asked for all of the missing CADs, nothing ever came of our requests,
none of the judges ordered this to be done.
Crown Road has a lot of history for events they were ongoing in this location from April
2014 till around June 2014, in fact maybe later than June 2014.
I do not really need to bring the intelligence reports and CADs up as the information I will
supply later in this letter regarding Progress Way will become very relevant as to what the
police are hiding. The reason I’m going to go to some detail here is because I do not feel it is
correct that the police are allowed to get away with what they have done within this case
towards my son due to how much they dislike him and my family. And I believe it will show
how much the police are willing to do in order to put everything onto my son.
Let me give you some CADs Numbers I will not go over everyone as there is a great deal of
them and some have got so much redaction we can only wonder why.
CAD 2410:08/06/2014 all grid references are redacted, most of the second and third pages
are redacted, but what gives this away as being Crown Road is what has been written by the
call handler on page 4.
“illegal rave going on opposite A&J Cars approx. 200 people1 drugs being openly sold and
taken caller noticed them whilst on his way home, they're all over the Street.”
“Linked to cads 1646 & 1768 08June”
Any police officer would know that A&J Cars is right by Crown Road, right opposite the Old
Mann Building where the events was ongoing for months, and nowhere near Progress Way.
The CAD numbers 1646 and 1768 08 June are missing we were never allowed to have these.
CAD 3319:08/06/2014, Grid Reference below,
Att Location: SOUTHBURY RD/CROWN ROAD
Map: Page 082, Grid Reference 534960,196240
GPA: YP [Division: YE: JC]