Page 238 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All
P. 238

been pulled over because he was driving too close to the car in front of him, the driver who
               was in the car in front of the claimant never stopped, and was not stopped by police. The
               claimant was then accused of having drugs, the claimant allowed police to search him and his
               vehicle nothing was found. The police then asked the claimant what he was up to, the
               claimant said that he was setting up his catalogue that he had been building with a friend, and
               that the website that was being built was nearly completed. The claimant said that he was
               trying to achieve positive effects within today’s society with his business that he had been
               building. Once the police had completed all their checks they needed, they shook hands and
               went on our way.
               At no time did the claimant act in an anti-social manner towards the police.
               It seems the police stated other things in their report that are very untrue, please see below
               “On Thursday 24th July 2014 at around 1625 hours, plain clothes officers from YE Gangs
               Unit had cause to stop the following male on ALMA ROAD EN3. Simon CORDELL. He
               was driving a silver Ford Focus vrm MA57LDY on which he is insured but is not the
               registered keeper. He was stopped as he was driving about 1" from the bumper of the car in
               front of him and his driving was erratic. He claimed to know the other driver; this male
               however approached officers saying he had been driving like that behind him since YR.
               CORDELL was obstructive as usual, refusing to get out of his vehicle etc. He stated that his
               solicitor has a big case going where all his criminal records will be wiped as Police have
               unlawfully picked on him for years etc. Of interest he stated that he has 4 brand new speaker
               systems at home which he is happy to loan people for raves etc and that he is inundated with
               requests to run raves. He stated that he has 20,000 followers on one social media network and
               70,000 in another. He says that he could organize a rave and get 20,000 people at it without
               any problems whatsoever, and that he gets lots of requests from anarchist type groups etc to
               run raves for them. Of note he claims Occupy London, Black Block and other anarchist
               groups have been asking him to organize one for Notting Hill Carnival so that they can
               "Cause carnage and mayhem".
               The claimant is continuously being pulled up by the police for no reason this has been
               ongoing for the past at least 23 years, I believe the above comments within the police report
               shows this when it states CORDELL was obstructive as usual refusing to get out of his
               vehicle etc.
               The claimant did not get out of his vehicle right away he did not know why he was being
               pulled again, so waited in his car to ask the police why he had been stopped. it is not a crime
               to sit in your car until the police approach.
               2236
               219,
               Letter to high court C0 2171 2017.pdf
               The police state in their report he was driving about 1” from the bumper of the car in front of
               him and the claimant driving was erratic.
               If the claimant had been driving 1” from the bumper of the car in front of him, which I
               believe is impossible, and his driving was erratic, then surely the police would have arrested
               him for dangerous driving, the police always try and find a way to arrest the claimant for any
               reason they can, and I am hundred percent sure if the claimant was driving like this he would
               have been in the police station under arrest for it. The driver in the car that was in front of the
               claimant did not stop and speak to the police if he had done this why have the police not
               given the drivers details.
               The claimant did not speak to the police in regard to loaning out his equipment for raves. The
               numbers that the police have stated that the claimant said he had in 2 accounts on social
               media is impossible and is unbelievable that the police have stated such information. The
               police have also stated that the claimant spoke of links to Occupy London, Black Block and
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243