Page 240 - 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table All

event location was meant to have been in Harrow, every decibel matters state on the date of
the event they were in Harrow and police sent helicopters all day looking for them, they had
no option but to relocate I believe this is when they relocated to Millmarsh Lane, the claimant
had no knowledge of this and was never in Harrow, and knew nothing regarding this being
relocated to Millmarsh Lane.
The officer in charge of the application Steve Elsmore has stated in one of his updated
statements that the claimant knew Mr Moses Howe, and that he has been stopped by police
with Mr Moses Howe once in the claimant’s vehicle 2011.
The claimant does not dispute he does have knowledge of Mr Moses Howe, Mr Moses Howe
is a sound engineer, in 2011 the claimant had been offered the management position at Club
Juice in Green Street Enfield, the claimant would as part of his job role be organising events
for Club Juice this would have included the claimant’s sound system being within the venue.
Due to the claimant in 2011 not having much knowledge of all the complicated knowledge
needed setting up the sound system he asked people he knew if they knew a sound engineer,
Mr Moses Howe name was given, the claimant and Mr Moses Howe agreed to meet and go to
the venue check what would be needed in regards to equipment, and it was agreed that if it
took off Mr Moses Howe would be the sound engineer for club juice. When the police pulled
the claimant and Mr Moses Howe was in the vehicle, they were on their way to Club Juice,
they were due to set the sound system up in order to allow testing
2238
221,
Letter to high court C0 2171 2017.pdf
and make sure everything was in order. Within the weeks that followed they had set up one
event that was due to take place at club juice, but due to how the police was with the claimant
they kept pulling him up outside of Club Juice strip searching him and would not leave him
alone, the claimant got so distressed and embarrassed that he told the owner of Club Juice he
could no longer carry on, and left the position. Since this time the claimant has had no
knowledge of what Mr Moses Howe has been doing, Mr Moses Howe is the director with
Sean O'Connor of every decibel matters, as shown within the documents within the
claimant’s bundle.
If the claimant had a great deal of contact with Mr Moses Howe I am sure the police would
have a lot more than one date on the police’s system that the claimant had been with Mr
Moses Howe, the claimant as said above is pulled a great deal by the police and I believe that
this would have been shown on the police’s system. And not just one date in 2011.
CAD 9717 seems to have intelligence that was received by police on 09th August 2014, this
CAD was never included in the applications bundle, I believe this intelligence would have
been very helpful to the claimant and this is why it was never added to the application bundle.
As we believe it would prove the police had no information on my son.
It seems throughout this case there has been a lot of CADs and intelligence reports that have
not been included in the applications bundle; I believe the reason for this is that it would
show that what has been stated within the application is very misleading. I believe also that is
why we was never allowed to see them. I believe also that the police officers’ notebook’s
which we were also never allowed to see would also show how misleading the application
was towards the claimant.
There is a lot more information I have gained due to research I have done, there is also a lot
more points within the application that are misleading and incorrect, there is a list of breaches
under the data protection of information that is totally incorrect which can be proven. At this
time there is a case ongoing with the ICO in regards to breaches that the police have stated in
their application and also incorrect information on the claimant’s PNC record, all of this
information and a lot more was being bought up each time we attended court at the