Page 135 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

the Claimant's questionnaire was filed on 17th
November 2017 and there could be a possibility
of the Court reconsidering its decision of striking
out the Claim. I find his conduct against the spirit
of the Civil Procedures Rules which encourage
parties to cooperate, communicate and try to
resolve dispute out of Court. The Court order
dated 02nd January 2018 could have been
avoided had the Defendant acted with more
fairness and this conduct has partly triggered the
necessity to make this application notice which
means that the Claimant is now Incurring more
costs.
14.1 am also instructed that since the Court made
the interim injunction order on 09th August 2017,
the Defendant's anti-social Behaviour has ceased
towards the neighbours and no complaints have
been received from them. I am therefore of the
view that the residents and employees of the
Claimant could be prejudice if the Claim and
interim injunction order were not reinstated.
15. As a result of the above, we would like the
Court to set aside the orders made on 13th
December 2017 and 02nd December 2018. The
Claimant would also like the Claim and interim
injunction to be reinstated and an order that the
Defendant pays the Claimant’s costs as his
conduct has led to the necessity to make the
present application.

28

CLAIM NUMBER: D02EDO73

IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT

BETWEEN:

{CLAIMANT}

THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE
LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD

-AND-

(DEFENDANT)

MR SIMON CORDELL

DIRECTIONS ORDER