Page 38 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

19. The recent incidents and death threats are
extremely serious and i have concerns that the
Defendant may escalate his actions further. Mr
Mathiyalagan and his family do not feel safe
anymore and on that basis, it would be of great
assistance if the Claim and injunction order be
reinstated as soon as possible.
Declaration from the Court that the injunction
order has been effective throughout the period
of 13th December 2017 to present
20. The interim injunction order was
discharged purely because of a technicality,
however had the Court realised that the Claimant
had filed the questionnaire on time, it would not
have struck out the Claim.
21. The Court should note that the Defendant
started to act anti-socially again, soon after he was
notified by the Court that the interim order has
been discharged. Unfortunately, because the
Claim was struck out the Claimant and the police
are currently not able to take any actions against
the Defendant. It is on that basis that we would
like to ask the Court for a declaration that that the
interim injunction order has been effective since
13th December 2017 and that the Defendant has
been in breach of the interim injunction order
dated 09th August 2017.
22. However, in the event that the Court
cannot make such a declaration, we would ask the
Court to make a new injunction order to cover the
recent incidents dated 02nd and 3rd January
2018 and enclose a new claim for an injunction
for the Court's consideration.

15
09th August 2017
11th November 2017
02nd and 3rd January 2018.
08th January 2018

CLAIM NUMBER: D02EDO73

IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT

BETWEEN:

{CLAIMANT}

THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE
LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD