Page 43 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

assault. The police could see the facial injuries,
bleedings and damages sustained to his face and
teeth but decided to keep him at the police station
while he was a victim of the assault. Surprisingly I
heard that Mr Cordell was arrested, interviewed
and released on the same day. The police decided
not to charge him for some unknown reasons.
6. I believe that the Police decision was wrong, as
there is Clear evidence of assault, I was not
interviewed while being a key witness to the
incident. The Defendant should have been arrested
and brought back to the Court following the
breach of the injunction order so it could decide
on his arrest.
7. I fear for my family safety and feels that the
interim injunction with the London Borough of
Enfield obtained on
09 January 2018
is not providing me and my family protection as
the police refuses to enforce the terms of the order
despite clear evidence that Mr Cordell has
breached the terms.

108,
20/04/2018
11/11/2017
02/01/2018
03/01/2018
01/03/2018
26/02/2018
11 November 2017
02-03 January 2018
01 March 2018
26 February
20 day of April 2018
20/04/2018
Dated: 20 April 2018

CLAIM NUMBER: D02EDO73

IN THE EDMONTON COUNTY COURT

BETWEEN:

{CLAIMANT}

THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE
LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD

-AND-