Page 740 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

6. The Claimant do by 4pm on 09/02/2018 file and serve an affidavit of service.
7. The Claimant do by 4pm on 09/02/2018 serve on the Defendant by first class post its
application of 05/02/2018.
8. Matter be listed for further consideration of the order 09/01/2018 and the Claimant's
application referred to above, on 30/05/2018 at 14:00pm (time estimate 1 hour).
9. The Defendant's address for service is 109 Burncroft Avenue, Enfield EN3 7JQ
I have received the new application and within the documents is a statement of affidavit of
service which I am still disputing was served correctly.
Within the statement of affidavit of service from Andy Philippou, a Process Server of Global
Investigation Services Limited, Earnscliff House, London N99AB, it states please see below.
“1. That I am over sixteen years of age.
1. That I did on Wednesday 10 January 2018 at approximately 10.20.am attend at the
offices of VLS Solicitors, Gibson House, 800, High Road, Tottenham, London N17 ODH
in order to meet with the Defendant's Solicitor. That I did at approximately 10.30.am.
meet and personally serve Suzanne Ozdemir (receptionist) of VLS Solicitors with the
following:
2. An Injunction Order dated 09 January 2018 with Notice of Hearing on OS/02no18 at
2.pm
3. A General Form of Judgement or Order dated 09 January 2018 A Power of Arrest dated
09 January 2018 An N244Application Notice
4. A Statement of Lemmy Nwabusi dated 08 January 2018, with exhibits A Court Order •
5. A Statement of Ludmilla lyavoo dated 03 January 2018, with exhibits
740
84,
Si-Letter-to-court-03-03-2018.pdf
6. That I did on the same date at approximately 11.30.am and in the absence of a response
from
7. the Defendant's address of 109 Burncroft Avenue, Enfield, Middlesex EN3 7JQ post
through the
8. letterbox of 109 Burncroft -Avenue, Enfield, Middlesex EN3 7JQ copies of the
aforementioned
9. documents in a sealed plastic wallet for the attention of the defendant.
10. That I did on the same date having had notification from the Claimant Solicitor of the
Defendant's- arrest the previous evening attend at Wood Green Police Station in order to
meet and personally serve the defendant with the aforementioned documents. That. I did
after having had to wait post interview and having the matter referred to the duty
Sergeant by Officer Tahir Razzaq; meet and serve the above-named defendant with the
aforementioned documentation in the presence of five officers in the doorway of holding
cell 9.
11. That at the time of service the aforementioned defendant admitted his identity to me as
Simon Cordell, namely an adult male of mixed race, possibly in his mid-20's,
approximately 5'10" tall and slim build.
12. This statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and .1 make it knowing that,
if it were tendered in evidence, I would be liable to prosecution if I wilfully stated in it
anything which I know to be false or did-not believe to be true. ”
As stated, this is a new interim injunction order dated the 09/01/2018 so why did the
Claimant serve this to a solicitor who in fact was not dealing and new nothing about this
application, and in fact is not representing in this new case.
I believe posting this in someone door does not class this application as it being served.