Page 741 - 9. 1st half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table

And I believe the police allowing a person into the police custardy area where I was being
held in a cell and then allowing this person along with five police officers is wrong in law.
There is also the fact that Andy Philippou has stated he personally serve the defendant with
the aforementioned documents in the cell and that I give my name.
th
This is untrue as I stated to the judge on the 05 February 2018, I would not allow the above
person to serve me any documents while I was in police custardy, I stated that
741
85,
Si-Letter-to-court-03-03-2018.pdf
the police came to my cell with the person, and I stood by the CCTV camera in the police cell
with my hands over my ears and started shouting so I could not hear anything that was being
said. Due to me doing this the police closed the cell door and asked the person to leave the
police station.
There is also the fact that the police had told me they were going to allow this person to serve
me in the police station, my solicitor and mother was also told this, I had told the police I
would not allow this to happen, which my solicitor also told the police I would not allow this.
My mother also spoke to the officer in change and told him it was a breach of law to allow
this, the police are getting involved in a civil court matter which I would not have any control
over as I was classed as not a free person, and the police had total control, that the order
should only be served at my home address or a business work place. The officer in change
said he would talk to the custardy officer and let her know what he said, when he asked the
custardy officer he told the officer in charge he was going to allow this, which was then
passed on to my mother and my solicitor.
At this point in time I have asked the police for a subject access request of the CCTV and
also all records of me bring in the police station.
I dispute that the interim injunction order was served on me personally at the police station.
I also depute the facts which the Claimant have put in this interim injunction order, since
2014 I have been left in my home with no help from the Claimant, many calls have been
made many emails have been sent as well as complaints, but it would seem to be the case that
the Claimant have ignored everything regarding me and only go on what the neighbours have
said, I have been left to live in hell with what the neighbours are doing, I have to live in my
own home with CCTV in every room so my movements are recorded, I record everything as
this is the way I have been left to live like in my own home, because I am being blamed for
everything that goes on in my block of flats.
741
86,
There is many emails which show I asked the Claimant for help regarding what is going on
where I can sit down in my home and show the Claimant what is going on with my family
there with me, The Claimant has refused to come out and take any reports from me and tell
me I have to go to them to do this but they have been told I do not cope well when I have to
leave my flat, but it seems the Claimants have no problem with going to the neighbours when
they say anything.
It is ironic that I was begging for help in many emails and phone calls before any complaints
when into to the Claimants about me, yet I am left to deal with it on my own with no help
when I was asking for help. But as soon as a complaint went in from the neighbour the
Claimants act on it. I believe there is reasons for this, and I believe they will be fully seen by
the court.
I have made so many calls to the police which I do have all the CAD numbers begging for
help I just get told they won’t get involved but as soon as the neighbours put a complaint in
the police are there to arrest me.