Page 1561 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1561

/ Page Numbers: 4423,4424,
               From: Lorraine Cordell
               lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
               Sent: 17 December 2018 17:12
               To: Andrea Clemons
               alev.cazimoglu@parliament.uk
               Subject: RE: Mr Simon Cordell
               109 Burncroft Avenue
               EN3 7JQ
               Dear Andrea Clemons and Alev Cazimoglu
               Today the MP's aid for Joan Ryan, Alev Cazimoglu sent me a copy of your letter dated the
               12/12/2018, I am shocked to see what is written within it and the misleading information
               being passed over to the MP Joan Ryan. It was not agreed on the condition that Mr Cordell
               should engage with mental health services and provide medical evidence to support the
               housing management transfer application. The court did not state this so I do not know
               where this is coming from. I also do not understand where it is coming from that Mr Cordell
               had to provided supporting letter from the mental health services to support his management
               transfer application, and he has not done this, he was never meant to have done this and the
               management transfer application was completed by Enfield Council to go to the panel on the
               17/08/2018 and it was ready to go to the panel on this date, but this was deferred to be
               considered at the next panel meeting which would have taken place on 28/09/2018, which
               never happened. The reason for it being deferred was so that I Miss Lorraine Cordell could
               try and get a letter from the mental health team, which I could not so it therefore should have
               gone ahead to the panel on the 28/09/2018, which I do have the emails to prove this. I also do
               not understand why Enfield Council is stating supported accommodation was being asked for
               as this was never asked for. I did however state in court that a 2 bedroom would be better as
               my son could have family live with him so he could get support from his family; I have never
               said I am his carer I have never said a lot of things that Enfield Council is stating I have said.
               It was stated in the court order.
               •       UPON the Defendant's mother Mrs Lorraine Cordell, confirming that she will engage
               with the Claimant and assist the Defendant's neighbourhood officer in making a housing
               management transfer application on or before 16 August 2018.
               •       UPON the Claimant agreeing that it will deal with the housing management transfer
               application as quickly as possible after being made.
               •       AND UPON the Defendants mother agreeing to engage with the Enfield Mental
               Health Unit team so the Defendant could receive assistance with his mental health conditions
               and housing.
               The order was to be agreed with my son’s solicitor upon being drafted by Enfield Council,
               but my son’s solicitor was on annual leave and therefore did not reply to Enfield Council
               order until she came back of leave, But when you emailed her it came back that she was on
               annual leave so Enfield Council was well aware of this. Upon her return from annual leave
               her amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Lyavoo, which my son’s solicitor never had a
               reply back from Ludmilla Lyavoo regarding her amended order, but some days after the
               amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Lyavoo, it seems an order was sealed at Edmonton
               Country Court which was not agreed on which was Enfield Council drafted order, which we
               never agreed to and feel it is misleading as to what was said in court. I believe a lot of what
               was said in court is not being told and misleading information is being said, maybe someone
               should ask Ludmilla Lyavoo what the judge said when Ludmilla Lyavoo said she
               4424,
   1556   1557   1558   1559   1560   1561   1562   1563   1564   1565   1566