Page 1561 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1561
/ Page Numbers: 4423,4424,
From: Lorraine Cordell
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent: 17 December 2018 17:12
To: Andrea Clemons
alev.cazimoglu@parliament.uk
Subject: RE: Mr Simon Cordell
109 Burncroft Avenue
EN3 7JQ
Dear Andrea Clemons and Alev Cazimoglu
Today the MP's aid for Joan Ryan, Alev Cazimoglu sent me a copy of your letter dated the
12/12/2018, I am shocked to see what is written within it and the misleading information
being passed over to the MP Joan Ryan. It was not agreed on the condition that Mr Cordell
should engage with mental health services and provide medical evidence to support the
housing management transfer application. The court did not state this so I do not know
where this is coming from. I also do not understand where it is coming from that Mr Cordell
had to provided supporting letter from the mental health services to support his management
transfer application, and he has not done this, he was never meant to have done this and the
management transfer application was completed by Enfield Council to go to the panel on the
17/08/2018 and it was ready to go to the panel on this date, but this was deferred to be
considered at the next panel meeting which would have taken place on 28/09/2018, which
never happened. The reason for it being deferred was so that I Miss Lorraine Cordell could
try and get a letter from the mental health team, which I could not so it therefore should have
gone ahead to the panel on the 28/09/2018, which I do have the emails to prove this. I also do
not understand why Enfield Council is stating supported accommodation was being asked for
as this was never asked for. I did however state in court that a 2 bedroom would be better as
my son could have family live with him so he could get support from his family; I have never
said I am his carer I have never said a lot of things that Enfield Council is stating I have said.
It was stated in the court order.
• UPON the Defendant's mother Mrs Lorraine Cordell, confirming that she will engage
with the Claimant and assist the Defendant's neighbourhood officer in making a housing
management transfer application on or before 16 August 2018.
• UPON the Claimant agreeing that it will deal with the housing management transfer
application as quickly as possible after being made.
• AND UPON the Defendants mother agreeing to engage with the Enfield Mental
Health Unit team so the Defendant could receive assistance with his mental health conditions
and housing.
The order was to be agreed with my son’s solicitor upon being drafted by Enfield Council,
but my son’s solicitor was on annual leave and therefore did not reply to Enfield Council
order until she came back of leave, But when you emailed her it came back that she was on
annual leave so Enfield Council was well aware of this. Upon her return from annual leave
her amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Lyavoo, which my son’s solicitor never had a
reply back from Ludmilla Lyavoo regarding her amended order, but some days after the
amended order was sent over to Ludmilla Lyavoo, it seems an order was sealed at Edmonton
Country Court which was not agreed on which was Enfield Council drafted order, which we
never agreed to and feel it is misleading as to what was said in court. I believe a lot of what
was said in court is not being told and misleading information is being said, maybe someone
should ask Ludmilla Lyavoo what the judge said when Ludmilla Lyavoo said she
4424,

