Page 1563 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1563

had to provided supporting letter from the mental health services to support his management
               transfer application, and he has not done this, he was never meant to have done this and the
               management transfer application was completed by Enfield Council to go to the panel on the
               17/08/2018 and it was ready to go to the panel on this date, but this was deferred to be
               considered at the next panel meeting which would have taken place on 28/09/2018, which
               never happened. The reason for it being deferred was so that I Miss Lorraine Cordell could
               try and get a letter from the mental health team, which I could not so it therefore should have
               gone ahead to the panel on the 28/09/2018, which I do have the emails to prove this. I also do
               not understand why Enfield Council is stating supported accommodation was being asked for
               as this was never asked for. I did however state in court that a 2 bedroom would be better as
               my son could have family live with him so he could get support from his family; I have never
               said I am his carer I have never said a lot of things that Enfield Council is stating I have said.
               It was stated in the court order.
               •  UPON the Defendant's mother Mrs Lorraine Cordell, confirming that she will engage
                   with the Claimant and assist the Defendant's neighbourhood officer in making a housing
                   management transfer application on or before 16 August 2018.
               •  UPON the Claimant agreeing that it will deal with the housing management transfer
                   application as quickly as possible after being made.
               4426,
               • AND UPON the Defendants mother agreeing to engage with the Enfield Mental Health
               Unit team so the Defendant could receive assistance with his mental health conditions and
               housing. The order was to be agreed with my son’s solicitor upon being drafted by Enfield
               Council, but my son’s solicitor was on annual leave and therefore did not reply to Enfield
               Council order until she came back of leave, But when you emailed her it came back that she
               was on annual leave so Enfield Council was well aware of this. Upon her return from annual
               leave her amended order was sent over to Ludmilla lyavoo, which my son’s solicitor never
               had a reply back from Ludmilla lyavoo regarding her amended order, but some days after the
               amended order was sent over to Ludmilla lyavoo, it seems an order was sealed at Edmonton
               Country Court which was not agreed on which was Enfield Council drafted order, which we
               never agreed to and feel it is misleading as to what was said in court. I believe a lot of what
               was said in court is not being told and misleading information is being said, maybe someone
               should ask Ludmilla lyavoo what the judge said when Ludmilla lyavoo said she would go for
               a possession order to the judge because she did not get what she wanted. There is also the fact
               that my son was willing to stay in Hospital when he was sectioned on the 25/10/2018, it was
               the hospital that discharged him on the 15/11/2018 due to not getting the section 3 on my son
               they wanted, that was heard on the 14/11/2018, my son said as soon as he knew they was not
               allowing the section 3 on the 14/11/2018 that they would kick him out of the hospital, as this
               is what they did in 2016, and the next day the 15/11/2018 that is what the doctors did kicked
               him out the hospital, yet my son was willing to stay and build trust up with the doctors and
               the mental health team, which had broken down due to what has been ongoing for some time.
               Which in fact would have been a lot better as if he had been allowed to stay in hospital like
               he wanted maybe by now they would have been trust built up with the doctors and teams, this
               is what Soohah Appadoo wanted to do as he saw that there was a real problem with trust and
               stated this at the appeal on the section 2 at the hearing. On the 15/11/2018 I myself spoke to
               Soohah Appadoo on the phone, but since that we have heard nothing from him is this what is
               being called support put in place when my son was discharged from hospital?
               This misleading information needs to stop as it is a beach of the data protection act. I look
               forward to hearing from you regarding this, please can you reply as I did not get a reply from
               you to my last email, I sent to you.
               Regards
   1558   1559   1560   1561   1562   1563   1564   1565   1566   1567   1568