Page 272 - 10. 2nd half 2018 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 272
08,
places in central London and placed on a curfew from 10 pm. Mr Cordell informed that he
followed these restrictions imposed on him for about a year and returned to Court and won
the case. Mr Cordell then went on to talk about Sally Gillcrest, the legal executive for the
metropolitan police who he alleged set him up for a million pounds and brought on an ASBO
against him, which ended with him being imposed on a nine-year curfew. Mr Cordell stated
that Sally Gillcrest in conjunction with the borough commander Jane Johnson and the
community officer started spreading rumours that he was “suffering from herpes and has
hurt a woman” which the neighbours in his block became aware of and started sending him
messages addressing him as “you; black boy. Mr Cordell implied that Sally Gillcrest colluded
with the neighbours as she had a vested interest in getting him out of this country. He
stated that the neighbours above him deliberately bang on his ceiling and have also subject
him to other forms of harassment since 2014. Mr Cordell implied that the neighbours were
responsible for the miscarriage suffered by his then girlfriend and also held them
responsible for the separation from his previous girlfriends. He further stated that between
2014 and 2016, his mother has made numerous complaints to the council regarding the
harassment he has been subject to and he has won a criminal case against his neighbours
8. Mr Cordell then went on to elaborate his grievance against Lemmy, the officer who
works for the Enfield local authority. He claimed that he received an email from lemmy
threatening that he would obtain a possession order against him and asking him to attend a
meeting. He then stated that the ASBO that was served against him was not valid due to
lack of signature. Therefore, Lemmy built a false case against him by using “lower grade
cases “to pursue a possession order and subsequently an injunction order, by falsifying
statements and using “statements from dead cases". According to Mr Cordell this was
declared as invalid by a Judge, however Lemmy has continued to produce false orders
against him in the way of a second injunction, which he claimed has never been served on
him. Mr Cordell described this as “targeted malice" by Lemmy as he has used the injunction
as a smoke screen to cover up the ASBO by providing false statements and witnesses.
9. In addition, Mr Cordell also described a number of grandiose beliefs, stating that he
was building a constitution on CIC, which he explained to be Community Interest Company.
He also spoke of a number of other businesses. He was keen to show us the various
documents, emails and recordings he has accrued as evidence to support his case.
3
09,
5. Opinion and Recommendations
Mr Cordell is a resident at the Enfield borough, who was served an injunction on 9 January
2018, following numerous complaints by his neighbours of antisocial behaviour and
harassment. Despite this, Mr Cordell has continued to breach the order with further
incidents of harassment, threats and assault against the neighbours. In addition, it has been
reported that some council employees have also received threats from Mr Cordell.
According to available information, Mr Cordell has had sporadic contact with the mental
health services and has been recently assessed by the Enfield Mental Health Assessment
Service. During my assessment, Mr Cordell was preoccupied with a number of persecutory
and grandiose delusional beliefs. In addition, he also presented with other symptoms such
as labile mood, pressured speech, overactivity and flight of ideas. In my view, Mr Cordell’s