Page 463 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 463

Supporting evidence of Police questioned under oath in relation to applicants ASBO on
               going application.
               R v Cordell
               Def
               Mother of D in court + potentially giving evidence.
               Met
               Police - No objections.
               Probably the case will go over till tomorrow.
               6 Witness of facts police.
               1 Officer in case.
               To be 6 - 22; Case statements.
               Def
               Just gave info, possession of new info on face book, not in bundles before court, but should
               be. Shows info suggesting never organised but other people did, nothing to do with w/d.
               DJ
               Interim ASBO made case by been well (unreadable text)
               DEF
               This evidence shows that Rave on 6/6/? Was nothing to do with w/d.
               Miss Cordell mother has carried out her own investigations as she was not happy with results
               of investigating officer / so/s.
               It is a large bundle to get through this late.
               If material can be viewed by DJ
               (Possible metered.) Then DJ can decide on admissibility of the evidence.
               DJ
               Producing material, however relevant, 10 minutes before a trial is not acceptable.
               Met Police 1st State
               DJ
               Has made application for ASBO ORDER.
               Inspector Hamill is to lead.
               Witness 1 - Inspector Hamill -R. O - 11.15am Statement contained in tab 9-lead DEF
               XEX
               Intel would be by open source, checked by an officer but was not done by me.
               The rave was taking place indoors.
               I have not personal spoken to the owners of the venue.
               I only see the D on the Saturday on the evening of the 7th Saturday.
               I did not go inside; the gates were closed.
               I did not see any vehicles.
               D’S Van reg is known to the police but I would not personally know.
               There were vehicles parked but I did not notice whether defendants van was there.
               He was not aware of people squatting in that building at that time.
               (Hearsay of officers continues D @ venue but (unreadable text) Officer (unreadable
               text) Not present here today.)
               There was a rave on an adjourning RD but not on that day. (Please Take Note Here of
               inspector Hamill stating under oath that he was sure all locations were to do with
               progress way on this date.)
               Phone calls received were not relating to Crown Rd Rave on that day.
               On the day in question phone calls related to this particular rave. (Progress Way)
               Met Police RE-XE
               My understanding is the door staff @ gate presented D as the event organiser.
   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468