Page 465 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 465
Saw sound equipment substance speakers poss.
Approximately the size of witness box but could not remember really as he was distracted by
people.
No further questions.
Witness - Pc Elsmore - R.O - 14:10 EIC Tab 6 - pg ?14?
DEF XEX
Council (unreadable text) curfews (unreadable text) that PNC info on statement adds no
(unreadable text) probatory (unreadable text)
value of info re: Witness being “afraid of D” What he puts down to the way he worded, but
he meant that people actually are afraid of possibly giving evidence in court.
R V CORDELL
4
DEF
Counsel argues that officer’s statement is designed to cause on evidence reaction of this of no
value and speculatory in nature.
DJ
How many calls from public did police receive?
Witness
In excess of 15 calls - how many to the same venue and no other address.
Doe’s does not know the number of callers that are in relation to each of these occasions.
On page 15 - Allegations re: Millmarsh Lane, evidence from officer not first-hand - relied on
cads and another Intel.
Query Re: “3 massive nitrous tanks”
DJ
Where did you get such info officer.
Witness
From Page 65 - sergeant King - Crimit’s Re reports, other Intel but not from people at the
venue.
COUNSEL
Officer you signed a statement of truth (unreadable text) to other witness statements.
DJ
We all know that on ASBO apps hearsay is allowed.
R V CORDELL
5
Counsel
Why did officer no and rely on Pc Kings Statements later than on the Crimit’s reported.
Officer no and involved in taking info from Pc King.
(Confesses he did it.)
He did not notice the discrepancy regarding official statements.
Have heard of Every Decibel Matters - They were advertising and I believe the D knows a
member of the above company.
No evidence D is involved in running their operations.
No attempt has been made to speak to directors of company.
No reason to why you didn’t /contact the company.
I think from memory have met D once @ Edmonton police station.
(At Page 16 1st paragraph - not consistent to fact that he met him on the 7/6/2014)
All notes with cad number were listed from reports not officers’ own words - same applies
from Cads that had not input.
Has not made attempts to contact owners of premises.