Page 465 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 465

Saw sound equipment substance speakers poss.
               Approximately the size of witness box but could not remember really as he was distracted by
               people.
               No further questions.
               Witness - Pc Elsmore - R.O - 14:10 EIC Tab 6 - pg ?14?
               DEF XEX
               Council (unreadable text) curfews (unreadable text) that PNC info on statement adds no
               (unreadable text) probatory (unreadable text)
               value of info re: Witness being “afraid of D” What he puts down to the way he worded, but
               he meant that people actually are afraid of possibly giving evidence in court.
               R V CORDELL
               4
               DEF
               Counsel argues that officer’s statement is designed to cause on evidence reaction of this of no
               value and speculatory in nature.
               DJ
               How many calls from public did police receive?
               Witness
               In excess of 15 calls - how many to the same venue and no other address.
               Doe’s does not know the number of callers that are in relation to each of these occasions.
               On page 15 - Allegations re: Millmarsh Lane, evidence from officer not first-hand - relied on
               cads and another Intel.
               Query Re: “3 massive nitrous tanks”
               DJ
               Where did you get such info officer.
               Witness
               From Page 65 - sergeant King - Crimit’s Re reports, other Intel but not from people at the
               venue.
               COUNSEL
               Officer you signed a statement of truth (unreadable text) to other witness statements.
               DJ
               We all know that on ASBO apps hearsay is allowed.
               R V CORDELL
               5
               Counsel
               Why did officer no and rely on Pc Kings Statements later than on the Crimit’s reported.
               Officer no and involved in taking info from Pc King.
               (Confesses he did it.)
               He did not notice the discrepancy regarding official statements.
               Have heard of Every Decibel Matters - They were advertising and I believe the D knows a
               member of the above company.
               No evidence D is involved in running their operations.
               No attempt has been made to speak to directors of company.
               No reason to why you didn’t /contact the company.
               I think from memory have met D once @ Edmonton police station.
               (At Page 16 1st paragraph - not consistent to fact that he met him on the 7/6/2014)
               All notes with cad number were listed from reports not officers’ own words - same applies
               from Cads that had not input.
               Has not made attempts to contact owners of premises.
   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470