Page 469 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

I had cylinders in my vehicle, requires legal authorisations, I have them on my car, for
welding - I do welding continuously. I do it as a hobby.
I was not at the location for a large rave.
I do remember many people turning up.
I remember police being in attendance.
I would never shout @ crowd - to busy talking to the police.
Pc statements are wrong.
There’s a possibility that I did say to police that it was a private conference.
DJ
Do you no that 20 people is the maximum - Yes Def xx EX
Was Pc Edgoose out of car? - I know two of them come out of car and approached me.
24th May Incident - Do you remember speaking with Pc Jackson? Do not remember names.
Paragraph of T and C’S Re Falcon Park (Statement)
Deposit does go back unless damage or loss stopping due to breach of agreement.
Amount = No Fee.
469
218,
Edited part 5.pdf
NFO.
R v CORDELL
-3-
DEF
Additional witness is not here.
Because the statement can be read but contain less weight because witness is not here.
Witness 2 can be here in one half hours.
Half evidence.
Half (unreadable text)
13:30pm
DEF
NF Witness.
(unreadable text)
Closing subs.
Statutory test key:
Whether D has acted in an Anti-Social Manner: to that did cause Alarm or Distress.
Astonishing of the council to make out that the whole eleven officers were wrong.
D’s evidence is also not merit able and neither his witness statements.
D’s Mothers evidence - totally irrelevant - her evidence is based on conspiracy police have
against her family.
7th June Witness Inspector Hamill and Sos. Miles and witness Cordell (D) Inspector Hamill
(unreadable text) miles points to D being the organiser.
Disruption and concern Rave caused outlined by Cad Reports and officers’ statements.
19th July Inspector Skinner describes a rave and Cordell being organiser, another statement
as far as D is concerned, which is totally wrong,
Crimit’s reports show D as organiser of large raves according to officer’s statements.
Test mode out of submissions above.
Consistent Patten of behaviour as by of D concerned.
- Test of (unreadable text) Nuisance (unreadable text) does not (unreadable text)
delaminates (unreadable text) of fact, but from Cad Re: alarm distress etc. Shows this has
happened.