Page 471 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 471

“D accepted he organised”, Pc Edgoose Page 50 - statement said he “did organise illegal
               raves” Admissions alleged from evidence, Entirely of conversations of others, not clear.
               27/07/14
               Same as Millmarsh Lane, hearsay evidence of number of Pc’s called and gave evidence.
               Interesting that someone other than D (unreadable text) led a (unreadable text)
               471
               219,
               Edited part 5.pdf
               Evidence of people living and potentially others on the land treating it as home.
               Further evidence inaccurate Shoplifters.
               9/10 August
               Evidence of Pc officers does not match up with allegations in application - on his duties odd
               their being squatters, also did not try to contact owner while on duty suggesting D there at
               private party - due to lack of suitable equipment, evidence D was attending a private party.
               Councillor: (unreadable text)
               The general credibility of the witness’s (unreadable text) errors because of the hearsay of
               Crimit’s of no prominence taken into account weight of statement.
               Page 32 (unreadable text) day and event 2
               Inconsistencies that are bios for officers to include evidence that favours Application by
               being unreadable.
               Allegation of 15 - 10 boys (unreadable text) to talk un relative of conduct.
               Fear of reprisals.
               LTC when given evidence was to prove sound organisation possibly which D accepts.
               If (unreadable text) D was polite on his case
               Investigation not performed with measurements as it should have been.
               Vendetta families highlighted.
               Inconsistence’s between start of Crimit’s, complete absinth of follow up is simply worrying.
               What other info is wrong that we have not been able to check?
               DJ
               Mr Justino (UN READABLE TEXT)
               Test Not related to police resources.
               Was ASBO serious and persistent?
               Decrease in activity - “huge decrees since Interim ASBO “but no indication of trends: before
               - after and previous years.
               Pc Elsmore couldn’t say why decrease in raves.
               Correspondence of consultation - so far this relay wrongfully weak evidence.
               Met on points of how
               The statutory test in relation to rave into what is required.
               DJ
               Delivery of judgment @ 15:32pm
               DJ
               Is satisfied, so that she is sure, that the D did act during dates in such a manner.
               ABSBO Granted
               Order necessary for reasons:
               Nature of the conduct of these parties’
               Noise (UN READABLE TEXT) civil(s)
               Police officers have to attend in large numbers.
               Since interim order there has been a decrease in this type of activity.
               Satisfied D has acted in as manner of such conduct that causes harassment alarm, distress.
   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476