Page 466 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Officers unable to assist courts in relation to why statements were not signed on notebooks
profiles.
Another example of doings put in statements to blacken Mr Cordell’s evidence in statement
@ point 12, No convictions that of class A drugs unlike what’s written in
466
216,
Edited part 5.pdf
Statements - another example of untrue cut and paste.
DJ
1ll ignore because no convections of class A drugs or supplying is present on the criminal
record.
Counsel
You cannot assist with witness reliability of info contained, can you?
Can Intel be wrongfully inaccurate? No Officer
On that particular re post, it appears to be right.
I did not speak to Parcel he is force @ seven boroughs.
I believe he was not included in the email, because Intel (unreadable text) Email sent to
LDE only.
Searched (unreadable text) for info on Cordell’s convections.
Moving on to statement on Page 30
Does PO investigating unit have more info than it is letting on?
Officer
No
Are you aware that Miss Cordell has spoken to other officers Re: Rave?
This suggests that you do not want DS Tanner to be examined on these proceedings because
she has information Re knowledge of raves and them not being connected to W/D.
Spoke to Pc Tanner but not written what - spoke to (unreadable text) this year You have no
recorded that you emailed her but then spoken to her.
Emails have been deleted and no copies keep on record.
Met police
XEX OF Witness vii
Done oath seductions:
Nothing in the contents of this report is inaccurate to my knowledge.
DEF
Hopefully the 2 witnesses on behalf of D should be able to give evidence tomorrow.
Witness viii
Miss Cordell ATT - 16:05 - EIC
D (her son) lives separately from me but I have been trying to help him sort out inaccuracies
with both his PNC and other police matters. Police is still popping around to his house -
Simon tells me and also I physically get to his flat before police have left.
He is being harassed by police.
DJ
Are 6 officers not reliant - on witness statement - there for putting a line though RD?
DEF
Material deters with PNC that was included by Met - Therefore right to challenge. Plus PNC
in evidence does not correct.
DJ
Very little weight will be given to PNC.
DJ
Miss Cordell Met XEX