Page 656 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

metal gate across the entry to the car park but this had a thick
chain and a padlock around it so that it could not be opened.
At no point had the applicant been to this location before, neither
did he put any lock, chain or padlock on any gate and at no point
did he instruct any other person to do so and that on his arrival
seven hours after police arrival he was not allowed access onto
the occupied site because when he approached carpet right the
police had it contained stopping access to any person(s) other
than police officers gaining entry.
"Please take note to pc Doglas Skinner statement paragraph two
dated
15/08/2014
1st line down page 36 of the applicants first bundle,
Doglas Skinner states: I saw a male I knew to be Simon Cordell
who came out of the building.
Now please take note to witness statement Doglas Skinner dated
15/08/2014
paragraph three, 1st line page 36
"Outside Carpet right I spoke to Cordell.
The prosecution state that police went there and Sergeant
Skinner also dealt with this and arrived at the time of 2210hrs.
There had been a 999 call that people were setting up a rave in
the Carpet right building
(The time of the 999 call was 22:11pm) and the CAD number of
the call that came in referred to in his statement to 20 people
pulling into an estate, the caller states 20 males and females all
white people.
The appellant is mixed race in colour otherwise known as an ic3
male and at no point was he one of the 20 white females or
males referred to.
If the building had not been occupied under section 144 LASPO
and being lived in as a place of residence the 20 people seen and
contained in the premises then would have been arrested for
trespassing or burglary and was not in fact arrested as they were
all de released.
The prosecution in their own words explain that: - “the
defendant was not there, but there was a Mr. Laidler who was
there.
The music system was loaded into a vehicle which does not
belong to the appellant, PE52 UHW.”
The applicant state; “that he was arrested outside the old carpet
right and had taking no part in any activity that happened in the
premises of the old carpet right 198 Great Cambridge Road
Enfield Town Enl Luj.
At no point was the appellant one of the people or vans referred
to on the land of carpet right or was he attending a rave, neither
was he acting in an Anti-Social Manner in reference to pages
295 to 296 of the Asbo applicants bundle and to prove this even
further, all of the address that are listed in the CAD at pages
(000), with the names of the people occupying carpet right and