Page 658 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half

Mr. Simon Cordell was arrested and detained, he continued to
try and state his points that he had nothing to do with the event
and also stated that it was unjustified that he had been detained
and only himself.
As stated in the statement provided by police officers stating that
people were detained in the land and building six hours before he
had arrived.
Doglas Skinner stats that the main organizer was spoken to by
police and that the applicant was that person this is not correct.
Doglas Skinner states; “It is said that Mr Simon Cordell admitted
to police that he was an organizing to the party and said he was
expecting several hundred people."
Mr Simon Cordell will state; “that this is not correct as stated the
keys were found on the premises and he never was on the
premises, Mr Simon Cordell will state that he was arrested
outside on the pavement as shown in Inspector Douglas Skinner
statement and that he could not have left the premises as said by
Inspector Douglas
Skinner the police had secured the premises 7 hours before he
had arrived."
Doglas Skinner states; “As a result the people inside the venue
all left."
Mr Simon Cordell will state; “that he feels this shows the way he
has been treated over the years and discriminated by police. He
states that the facts are the police had secured the premises, they
had a sound system contained in the premises, and occupiers on
the land, one of these people was arrested then de arrested (Mr
Simon Cordell will state that he has found this out since he has
contacted the director at company house of every decibel
matters, who has provided a statement as he was one of the
people detained inside the premises, by the police to then latter
be released.)
It is the prosecution’s case that whilst Mr. Sergeant Skinner was
dealing with Cordell, police were told that crowds were
gathering outside Southbury Road Train Station waiting to be
told where the rave was and that there is a CAD which relates to
the disturbance at the railway station where people were
gathering in order to receive further instructions.
That is at page 315 This intelligence could not be correct
because the applicant was not at carpet right from the first 999
cad call Page 303 with a time stamp of (22:07) he arrived at
03:50 when he first arrives and INSP skinner arrested him on his
arrival.
The time of the cad relating to people arriving at the train station
was at (23:44) page number 214 a total of four and six minutes
earlier.
It was wrong for the appellant to be detained on the 8th June
2014 by members of the metropolitan police force, without
charge or interview and an even further misplace of justice that