Page 659 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 2nd Half
P. 659

he has had an Asbo application put against him with un reliable
                 evidence as he was outside and arrested for an incorrect reason."
                 The applicant does not know who a Mr. Laidler is, so does not
                 understand why any person who does not know him would say
                 otherwise to Sergeant Skinner as he would not know his name
                 and would have no reason to say so.
                  The
                 02/07/2014
                 02nd July 2014
                 is the next event at Millmarsh Lane, Enfield?
                 What is noteworthy about this event is that there was a stack of
                 speakers at the event which were powered by the appellant 's
                 van, which he was also seen to drive.
                 His assertion was that this was a twentieth birthday party.
                 At page 401 he asserted that he was there as a guest.
                 It was a private house party.
                 On page 7 of his bundle he asserted this was a twentieth birthday
                 party.
                 I did not have a sound system.
                 There was no event.
                 The owners of the equipment were the occupiers.
                 I had no hand in it.
                 In the respondent's bundle at page 83 there is a report relation to
                 this incident.
                 The police had received information that a rave would be taking
                 place that evening and it appeared to be on a piece of land
                 between Gregg's factory and Pugh Charles Glass.
                 The police were let in and, on open land; there was a stack of
                 speakers being powered by a van belonging to Simon Cordell.
                 The police saw the van drive out with Simon Cordell driving it.
                 In reference to the ADR bill relating to the carriage of dangerous
                 goods; it is not against the law to carry nitro’s oxide or any co2
                 gas when having the correct signage on the vehicle transporting
                 the cylinders.
                 Again, we are satisfied so as to be sure that Mr. Cordell was
                 involved in the organization of what clearly was a rave or to be a
                 rave.
                 The final date relevant to this case relates to an event again at
                 Millmarsh Lane, next to the Gregg's factory.
                 This is another event which was nipped in the bud, but then
                 followed by general disorder, which took the police about three
                 hours to clear.
                 The appellant was on the gate.
                 His Ford Focus, MA57 LOY, was there.
                 Inside the Ford Focus there were three nitrous oxide canisters.
                 There was a sound system there.
                 In relation to that event, we had evidence from Officer King,
                 who went on 9th August to Millmarsh Lane, because intelligence
                 had been received, probably in the form of adve1tisements by
                 Every Decibel Matters. He went there with Sergeant Ames,
   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664