Page 489 - tmp

KGM have in fact not followed the protocol for the Subject access request
under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been put in 3 times already to
KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s Office as
I do not see any reason you would have to stop the information I have asked
for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no insurance.

And now say to deal with this you need information from me. I can understand
you want the information for the complaint that has been put in, but not the
information I asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for an appeal
that is ongoing. And in fact would not have been ongoing if the Subject
access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 as I would not have been
found guilty.

I would like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regards to
this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I was insured so there
should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted
going to court.

Regards

Simon Cordell

_____

From: Austin, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Austin@canopius.com]
Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54
To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
Subject: RE: MT3574694

Dear Mr Cordell

Thank you for your email.

My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following documentary evidence from
you

1467