Page 549 - tmp

KGM have in fact not followed the protocol for the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has
been put in 3 times already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s Office as I do not see

any reason you would have to stop the information I have asked for under this act to prove I was not in fact guilty of no

insurance.

And now say to deal with this you need information from me. I can understand you want the information for the

complaint that has been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for an appeal that

is ongoing. And in fact, would not have been ongoing if the Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 as
I would not have been found guilty.

I would like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regards to this so they can look at the facts and see if fact I

was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with more of my time wasted going to court.
Regards

Simon Cordell

From: Austin, Andrew [ mailto: Andrew. Austin@canopius. com

Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54

To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
Subject: RE: MT3574694

Dear Mr Cordell

Thank you for your email.

My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following documentary evidence from you

1527